Robinson v. Adams, et al.
Filing
108
ORDER Vacating the 95 Order Partially Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Referring the Matter Back to the Magistrate Judge, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/17/11. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GEORGE H. ROBINSON,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING THE ORDER PARTIALLY
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL AND REFERRING THE MATTER
BACK TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v.
D. ADAMS, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 95, 96, 103)
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
16
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an
17
order partially granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 95.) Defendants filed a request for
18
reconsideration by the District Judge on January 31, 2011, and Plaintiff filed an opposition to
19
Defendants’ request for reconsideration on March 10, 2011, which also contained objections to the
20
order. (ECF Nos. 96, 103.) On March 23, 2011, the undersigned reassigned the Magistrate Judge
21
on this case. (ECF No. 105.)
22
Upon review of the order and objections of the parties and in light of the Magistrate Judge
23
reassignment, the order partially granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel is VACATED. The motion
24
to compel is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for consideration.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
0m8i78
May 17, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?