Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 108

ORDER Vacating the 95 Order Partially Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Referring the Matter Back to the Magistrate Judge, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/17/11. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GEORGE H. ROBINSON, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING THE ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND REFERRING THE MATTER BACK TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. D. ADAMS, et al., (ECF Nos. 95, 96, 103) 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an 17 order partially granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 95.) Defendants filed a request for 18 reconsideration by the District Judge on January 31, 2011, and Plaintiff filed an opposition to 19 Defendants’ request for reconsideration on March 10, 2011, which also contained objections to the 20 order. (ECF Nos. 96, 103.) On March 23, 2011, the undersigned reassigned the Magistrate Judge 21 on this case. (ECF No. 105.) 22 Upon review of the order and objections of the parties and in light of the Magistrate Judge 23 reassignment, the order partially granting Plaintiff’s motion to compel is VACATED. The motion 24 to compel is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 0m8i78 May 17, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?