Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 122

ORDER DENYING 120 Plaintiff's Motion to Schedule Pretrial and Trial Dates as Premature signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/2/2011. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-SMS PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
SCHEDULE PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES
AS PREMATURE

v.
D. ADAMS, et al.,

13

(ECF No. 120)
Defendants.
/

14
15

On July 1, 15, and 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed motions for reconsideration by the District Judge

16

of the order granting in part and denying in part his motion to compel. On August 31, 2011, Plaintiff

17

filed a motion to schedule the pretrial and trial dates in this action. Since there are still discovery

18

issues pending in this action, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied as premature. Once Plaintiff’s

19

motion for reconsideration has been decided by the District Judge, and all discovery issues are

20

resolved, an order will issue setting dates in this action.

21
22

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to schedule pretrial and trial dates is HEREBY DENIED as
premature.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:
icido3

September 2, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1