Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 142

ORDER Requiring Defendants to Provide Status of Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/16/12. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

10
11

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS
PROVIDE STATUS OF DISCOVERY

TO

v.
(ECF No. 130)

12

D. ADAMS, et al.,
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

16

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed motions for sanctions based upon

17

Defendants’ alleged failure to provide discovery responsive to th March 16, 2012 order of this Court.

18

On June 1, 2012, Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions requesting an

19

extension of time to June 8, 2012 to provide documents responsive to the March 16, 2012. On June

20

20, 2012, Plaintiff filed a supplemental reply stating that he had still not received the ordered

21

discovery. On July 11, 2012, Defendants filed a supplemental opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for

22

sanctions, but failed to state whether Plaintiff has been served with responsive documents.

23

Accordingly, within five days from the date of service of this order, Defendants are required to notify

24

the Court of the status of the discovery ordered in the March 16, 2012 order.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

July 16, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1