Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 151

ORDER REQUIRING Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions 148 , 149 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/25/12. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM PC
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

v.
D. ADAMS, et al.,

13

(ECF Nos. 148, 149)
Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/

14
15

Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

16

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the complaint, filed May

17

13, 2008, against Defendants David, Miranda, Melo, Garcia, Mendoza, Martinez, and Masiel for use

18

of excessive force, and Defendants Adams and Ruiz for failing to protect Plaintiff in violation of the

19

Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Martinez, David, Miranda, and Garcia for assault and

20

battery in violation of state law.

21

On August 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel and request for sanctions. On August

22

27, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions. Defendants have failed to file an opposition or

23

statement of non-opposition to the motions. Local Rule 230(l).

24

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1.

Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s

26

motion to compel and motion for sanctions within thirty (30) days from the date of

27

service of this order; and

28

///
1

1

2.

2

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions deemed
appropriate by the Court. Local Rule 210.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

September 25, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2