Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 175

ORDER Granting 170 Request to Submit Documents Under Seal for In Camera Review; ORDER Regarding In Camera Review, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/13. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE H. ROBINSON, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. D. G. ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:08-cv-001380-AWI-BAM PC ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW (ECF No. 170) ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA REVIEW THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the complaint against 19 Defendants David, Miranda, Melo, Garcia, Mendoza, Martinez and Masiel for use of excessive force 20 in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendants Adams and Ruiz for failure to protect in 21 violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Martinez, David, Miranda and Garcia for 22 assault and battery in violation of state law. 23 On May 27, 2011, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s 24 motion to compel. As part of that order, the Court directed Defendants to “provide any and all 25 documents in Defendants’ personnel files of professional reprimands (including findings of policies 26 and procedures violations, colleague complaints by other officers against Defendants, written findings 27 and conclusions, and all documents relating to any review or evaluation of the job performance of 28 each of the herein Defendants during his/her employment with CDCR, etc.) by supervisors of 1 1 unnecessary use of excessive force while on the job.” (ECF No. 109, p. 19.) Defense counsel was 2 directed to submit copies of such documents to the Court for in camera review. 3 On April 12, 2013, defense counsel informed the Court that responses were submitted on 4 behalf of the wrong defendant. Defendants requested that the correct defendant, Jesse Martinez, be 5 permitted to supplement his response. The Court has granted Defendants’ request. 6 Concurrent with the request to supplement, defense counsel submitted documents for in 7 camera review on behalf of Defendant Martinez, along with a request for seal. Defendant Martinez’s 8 request to submit the documents under seal is GRANTED. 9 Additionally, the undersigned has reviewed the documents and Defendant’s request for thirty 10 days to notify named inmates if any personal information is produced as required by California Civil 11 Code Section 1798.24.1 At this time, the Court informs the parties of its intended ruling to order that 12 the documents regarding Defendant Martinez’s reprimand for unnecessary use of force in 2008 be 13 produced with all personal information, other than employee names and/or inmate names, redacted. 14 The Court’s intended ruling will allow Defendants sufficient time to request a protective order and to 15 notify any inmates that their information shall be provided to Plaintiff pursuant to this Court’s order. 16 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted thirty-days in which to 17 apply for further protective order relating to these documents, if necessary, and as permitted by the 18 Court’s March 16, 2012 order. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: /s/ Barbara May 16, 2013 22 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 23 10c20kb8554 24 25 1 26 27 28 “No agency may disclose any personal information in a manner that would link the information disclosed to the individual to whom it pertains unless the information is disclosed, as follows: . . . To any person pursuant to a subpoena, court order, or other compulsory legal process, if, before the disclosure, the agency reasonably attempts to notify the individual to whom the record pertains, and if the notification is not prohibited by law. . . .” Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.24(k). Personal information includes, but is not limited to, any information “that identifies or describes an individual, including his or her name, social security number, [and] physical description. . . .” Civ. Code § 1798.3. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?