Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 224

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's REqeust for Order Directing Defendants to Provide Current Location of Inmate Witness re 219 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/12/14. Fourteen Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GEORGE H. ROBINSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
D. G. ADAMS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-BAM PC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
PROVIDE CURRENT LOCATION OF INMATE
WITNESSES
(ECF No. 219)

Plaintiff George H. Robinson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s
complaint against Defendants David, Miranda, Melo, Garcia, Mendoza and Masiel for use of
excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendants Adams and Ruiz for failure
to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Martinez, David, Miranda
and Garcia for assault and battery in violation of state law. A jury trial is scheduled for March 10,
2015.
On September 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an order directing Defendants to
provide him with the current location of inmate witnesses. Plaintiff asserts that the addresses are
necessary to prepare a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses as outlined in the Court’s
1

1

Second Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 219.) Defendants have not filed a response. Accordingly,

2

Defendants are HEREBY DIRECTED to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the

3

motion within fourteen (14) days.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

November 12, 2014

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2