Robinson v. Adams, et al.

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Plaintiff's 36 Motion to Strike signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/8/2010. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff George H. Robinson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se. The action was removed from Kings County Superior Court on September 11, 2008, by Defendants Adams, David, Melo, Martinez, Ruiz, Miranda, Mendoza, and Masiel. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302, and on November 20, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations recommending denial of Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' answer. Objections were due within thirty days, and none were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 20, 2009, is adopted in full; and v. D. G. ADAMS, et al., Defendants. / GEORGE H. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01380-AWI-GSA PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE (Docs. 36 and 39) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' answer, filed August 28, 2009, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 January 8, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?