Jimenez v. Spaeth

Filing 54

ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to Comply With Local Rule 133(j) On or Before July 9, 2013, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/2/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CARLOS JIMINEZ, Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 133(J) ON OR BEFORE JULY 9, 2013 DR. M. SPAETH, Defendant. 14 15 Case No. 1:08-cv-01419-LJO-SKO PC _____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Carlos Jimenez, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis, filed this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 23, 2008. Pending before the Court is 19 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed on September 17, 2012. Defendant cited to and 20 included a portion of her deposition transcript in support of her opposition, but she failed to 21 comply with Local Rule 133(j), which requires her to provide the Court with a courtesy copy of 22 the entire deposition. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Defendant is HEREBY ORDERED to bring her motion for summary judgment into 2 compliance with Local Rule 133(j) on or before July 9, 2013.1 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7 July 2, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 DEAC_Signature-END: i0d3h8j27 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Defendant may either lodge the transcript in hard copy with the Clerk’s Office or email it via PDF to skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?