Morris et al v. City of Fresno et al
Filing
179
STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/13/2012. (Yu, L)
1
James J. Arendt, Esq.
Brande L. Gustafson, Esq.
Bar No. 142937
Bar No. 267130
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
1630 E. Shaw Avenue, Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: (559) 221-5256
Facsimile: (559) 221-5262
2
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendant OFFICER CHRISTOPHER LONG
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ROBERT MORRIS and MICHELLE
MORRIS, pro se
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT,
)
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER LONG,
)
OFFICER JEREMY DEMOSS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Ninth Amended Complaint Filed: January 11,
2012
Trial Date: May 8, 2012
THE PARTIES, through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the Scheduling
Order (Doc. No. 165) only as it pertains to taking the depositions for the following individuals:
Christopher Long, Alicia Lopez, and Sean Holguin.
///
///
///
///
///
///
27
28
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01422-AWI-MSJ
____________________________
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1
The current deadline for discovery is February 17, 2012. The parties stipulate that the discovery
2
deadline be extended to March 30, 2012 just as to deposing the foregoing individuals.
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
5
DATED: February 9, 2012
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
6
7
By:
8
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson
James J. Arendt
Brande L. Gustafson
Attorneys for Defendant Christopher Long
9
10
11
DATED: February 9, 2012
KEVIN G. LITTLE
ATTORNEY AT LAW
12
13
By:
/s/ Kevin G. Little
Kevin G. Little
Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Morris
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated:
February 13, 2012
24
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
25
Michael J. Seng
ci4d6
26
27
28
____________________________
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?