Morris et al v. City of Fresno et al

Filing 240

ORDER GRANTING Defendant Christopher Long's Request to Seal Documents signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/2/2012. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 James D. Weakley, Esq. James J. Arendt, Esq. Brande L. Gustafson, Esq. WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 1630 E. Shaw Avenue, Suite 176 Fresno, CA 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 3 4 5 6 Bar No. 082853 Bar No. 142937 Bar No. 267130 Attorneys for Defendant OFFICER CHRISTOPHER LONG 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ROBERT MORRIS and MICHELLE MORRIS, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) OFFICER CHRISTOPHER LONG, ) OFFICER JEREMY DEMOSS, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________ ) CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01422-AWI-MJS ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER LONG’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS [USDC Eastern District Local Rule 141] Trial: August 21, 2012 18 Having reviewed Defendant’s Notice of Request to Seal Documents, Defendant’s Request to Seal 19 Documents, and Defendant’s Sealed Documents, and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, Defendant’s 20 Request to Seal Documents is hereby GRANTED. The following documents, having been submitted 21 to this Court and served on all parties, SHALL BE SEALED indefinitely and cannot be unsealed without 22 a subsequent order from this Court: 1. 23 Exhibit AK to the Declaration of Brande L. Gustafson in Support of Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Additional Motions in Limine; 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Order Granting Defendant’s Request to Seal Documents 1 2. 2 The unredacted version of Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Additional Motions in Limine. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 0m8i78 August 2, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Defendant’s Request to Seal Documents 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?