United States v. Real Property Located at 42767 Road 80, Dinuba, California, Tulare County, APN: 013-020-041, including all appurtenances and improvements thereto

Filing 31

STIPULATION [Doc. 30] to STAY Case and to VACATED Scheduling Conference; ORDER: (1) case Stayed until conclusion of criminal case in 1:08-cr-00253-LJO; (2) Scheduling Conference hearing date of Sept. 13, 2010 - VACATED; (3) parties shall notify Court when criminal case has resolved; (4)Parties are to file a Status Report every 4 months in this case. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/8/2010. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
United States v. Real Property Located at 42767 Road 80, Di...appurtenances and improvements thereto Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 42767 ) ROAD 80, DINUBA, CALIFORNIA, ) TULARE COUNTY, APN: 013-020-041, ) INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES ) AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________________) 1:08-CV-01452-LJO-SMS STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, United States of America and Claimant Viridiana Cardenas Sanchez as follows: 1. Claimant Jesus Fletes is presently facing federal criminal charges in the Eastern District of California, United States v. Jesus Fletes, 1:08-CR-00253-LJO, allegedly relating to transactions or events which form the basis for this civil forfeiture action. 2. The parties recognize that proceeding with this action has potential adverse affects on the prosecution of the related criminal case and/or upon Claimant Jesus Fletes' right against selfincrimination in the related federal criminal case. 3. As part of his plea in the related federal criminal action, Jesus Fletes has agreed to forfeit his interest in the property subject to forfeiture in this case and has agreed to execute any STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 documents effectuating said forfeiture. 4. Publication of the civil forfeiture action is complete and to date only Jesus Fletes and Viridiana Cardenas Sanchez has filed a claim and answer to this action. No other potential claimants have filed claims, answers, or otherwise appeared in this action and the time to do so has expired. THEREFORE, the parties to this action stipulate and request as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 981(g), this action be stayed pending the conclusion of the federal criminal action presently pending against Jesus Fletes in the Eastern District of California; 2. The Scheduling Conference in the civil case scheduled for September 13, 2010, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder be Vacated; and, 3. The parties are to promptly notify the Court when the criminal case resolves. BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Deanna L. Martinez DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney Dated: September 7, 2010 Dated: September 3, 2010 /s/ Daniel A. Bacon DANIEL A. BACON Attorney for Claimant Viridiana Cardenas Sanchez (original signature retained by attorney) 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties file a Status Report every four (4) months in this case. Dated: icido3 September 8, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?