Fratus v. Peterson et al

Filing 167

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to file a Motion for Summary Judgment or an Answer regarding the January 2007 Claim, no later than October 10, 2014, signed by District Judge Roslyn O. Silver on 9/18/14. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 John Fratus, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Sergeant Peterson, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-08-1500-ROS ORDER 15 The Ninth Circuit recently remanded this case “for the district court to follow the 16 framework outlined in [Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014)] in deciding the failure 17 to exhaust issue on the 2007 claim.” (Doc. 25-1 at 2-3). Based on that, Defendants will be 18 instructed to either file a motion for summary judgment or an answer to the complaint 19 regarding the January 2007 claim. Given the age of this case, the parties should not expect 20 extensions of briefing deadlines. 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS ORDERED no later than October 10, 2014 Defendants shall file a motion for 23 24 25 26 27 28 summary judgment or an answer regarding the January 2007 claim. DATED this 18th day of September, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?