Fratus v. Peterson et al
Filing
188
ORDER, signed by District Judge Roslyn O. Silver on 1/22/2015. (Case Management Deadline: 1/26/2015) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
John Fratus,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Sergeant Peterson, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-08-1500-ROS
ORDER
15
16
The parties recently filed their joint statement outlining the witnesses and evidence
17
they plan on presenting at the January 30, 2015 hearing. According to that statement,
18
Plaintiff wishes to call four witnesses: Sergeant Battle, Officer Baily, Kevin Maurice Rhodes,
19
and Megan White. Sergeant Battle has retired and relocated to Ohio. Securing his
20
attendance at the evidentiary hearing appears impractical and Plaintiff will not be allowed
21
to call him. In addition, the record fails to show how testimony from Kevin Maurice Rhodes
22
or Megan White would be relevant to this case. Thus, Plaintiff will not be allowed to call
23
those witnesses. Finally, Plaintiff claims he delivered his initial grievance form to Officer
24
Bailey on January 21, 2007. Officer Bailey, therefore, may have information relevant to the
25
exhaustion issue. Defendants will be required to arrange for Officer Bailey to appear at the
26
evidentiary hearing or provide an explanation why they are unable to do so. If they are
27
unable to secure his attendance, Defendants should indicate Officer Bailey’s contact
28
information such that he can be subpoenaed.
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS ORDERED no later than January 26, 2015 Defendants shall file a statement
3
indicating they will arrange for Officer Bailey to appear at the evidentiary hearing or provide
4
an explanation for why they are unable to do so. If necessary, Defendants should indicate
5
Officer Bailey’s contact information such that he can be subpoenaed.
6
DATED this 22nd day of January, 2015.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?