Pinzon v. Jensen et al
Filing
78
ORDER vacating Pretrial of 8/31/2011 and trial date of October 25, 2011. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/26/2011. (Nazaroff, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ABRAHAM G. PINZON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
RON JENSEN, RON JENSEN
)
CONSTRUCTION, PINECREST
)
MARKET, DAN VAUGHN, and DOES 1- )
50,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )
CIV-F-08-1543 AWI SKO
ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE AND TRIAL
17
18
In this case, summary judgment has been granted to Defendants Pinecrest Market and
19
Dan Vaughn. Two additional Defendants, Ron Jensen and Jensen Construction, were not part of
20
the summary judgment motions. Both have filed waivers of service and declined consent to
21
proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Docs. 16, 17, 24 and 25. Plaintiff Abraham Pinzon made a
22
motion for entry of default judgment on February 8, 2010. Doc. 36. Magistrate Judge Gary
23
Austin denied the motion without prejudice for failure to obtain a clerk’s entry of default. Doc.
24
38. As Judge Austin pointed out, “prior to bringing a [default judgment] motion under [Federal
25
Rule of Civil Procedure] 55(b)(2), the Clerk must enter default pursuant to Rule 55(a) which
26
provides as follows: ‘Entering a Default: When a party against whom affirmative relief is sought
27
has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the
28
clerk must enter the party’s default.’” Doc. 38, at 1:24-27. If Pinzon wishes to proceed against
1
1
Defendants Ron Jensen and Jensen Construction, he must follow the Federal Rules. The court
2
will expect some action by Pinzon within thirty (30) days.
3
4
The pretrial conference set for August 30, 2011 is VACATED. The trial set for October
25, 2011 is VACATED.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
0m8i78
August 26, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?