Couch v. State of California, et al
Filing
226
Third Amended Protective ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/27/2012. (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BROOKS M. BEARD (CA Bar No. 181271)
Email: bbeard@mofo.com
DANIEL A. ZLATNIK (CA Bar No. 259690)
Email: dzlatnik@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
EDWARD J. CADEN (CA Bar No. 166922)
Email: Edward.Caden@Cadenlaw.org
LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD J. CADEN
9245 Laguna Springs Drive, Suite 200
Elk Grove, California 95753
Telephone: (916) 729-3172
Facsimile: (916) 673-2134
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RYAN COUCH and KENNETH
JIMENEZ
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
RYAN COUCH and KENNETH JIMENEZ,
Case No. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
17
Plaintiff,
18
THIRD AMENDED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
19
20
21
TOMMY WAN, KIMBERLI BONCORE, and
RALPH DIAZ,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
Judge: Hon. Dennis L. Beck
1
2
1.
Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and it appearing that
3
discovery in this action will involve the disclosure of confidential information, it is hereby
4
stipulated by and between Plaintiffs Ryan Couch and Kenneth Jimenez (together, “Plaintiffs”)
5
and Defendants Tommy Wan, Kimberli Boncore, and Ralph Diaz (together, “Defendants”),
6
collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually referred to as “Party,” through their
7
respective counsel, and ordered that the following Protective Order be entered to give effect to the
8
terms and conditions set forth below:
9
10
11
2.
“Designating Party” means any one of the Parties producing Documents or
information under this Protective Order.
3.
“Document” or “Documents” shall have the broadest meaning permitted under
12
Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1001 of the Federal Rules of
13
Evidence, and relevant case law.
14
4.
“Protected Information” includes the following categories of information, and
15
shall include Documents produced during discovery, answers to interrogatories, responses to
16
requests for admissions, depositions, hearing or trial transcripts, and tangible things, the
17
information contained therein, and all copies, abstracts, excerpts, analyses, or other writings that
18
contain, reflect, or disclose such information.
19
A.
“CONFIDENTIAL” designates information that a Designating Party reasonably
20
believes to be confidential due to safety or security reasons, that is not readily available to the
21
public, and/or the disclosure of which is likely to result in imminent or substantial endangerment
22
to an inmate or prison employee.
23
B.
“REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL” designates information that is protected
24
against disclosure by various privacy laws, including, for example, social security numbers and
25
bank account numbers. Each redaction must be identified by showing what information has been
26
redacted (i.e., “social security number,” “bank account number” etc.). Other than information
27
protected against disclosure by applicable privacy laws or information redacted pursuant to the
28
Court’s June 24, 2011 (Dkt. 153) and September 23, 2011 (Dkt. 201) orders, no other information
shall be redacted. By way of example only, no names, nicknames, or inmate numbers shall be
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
1
1
2
redacted except as allowed by the Court’s June 24, 2011 (Dkt. 153) and September 23, 2011 (Dkt.
3
201) orders.
4
5
C.
The designation of information as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “REDACTED &
CONFIDENTIAL” is limited to information falling into one or more of the following categories:
i.
6
Prison, CDCR, or OIG policies, operational procedures, rules, or
regulations that have previously been designated as confidential;
7
8
ii.
personnel documents;
9
iii.
post orders;
10
iv.
investigation documents;
11
v.
documents contained in the central prison file, medical file, or parole files
of an inmate or former inmate;
12
vi.
13
any personal information regarding an inmate, former inmate, or staff
member employed or formerly employed by the CDCR or OIG;
14
vii.
15
information regarding the identity of a confidential informant and
confidential investigations; and
16
viii.
17
the information addressed in Eastern District of California Local Rule 39-
18
140, including minors’ names, financial account numbers, social security
19
numbers, and dates of birth.
20
However, information falling within these categories does not, solely by virtue of that fact, merit
21
designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information
22
must also meet the criteria described in Paragraphs 4.A and 4.B, respectively, to merit those
23
designations.
24
D.
“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “REDACTED &
25
CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designates information that constitutes part
26
of or an entire confidential memorandum produced from the confidential section of an inmate’s
27
central file or constitutes a part of or an entire debriefing report.
28
E.
Protected Information shall not include: (i) information that is in the public
domain at the time of disclosure; (ii) information that after disclosure is published or becomes
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
2
1
2
part of the public domain through no fault or action (in whole or in part) of any Party receiving
3
information under this Protective Order, but only after it is published or comes into the public
4
domain; (iii) information that is in the possession of a Party receiving such information without
5
any confidentiality obligations at the time of disclosure; or (iv) information disclosed by a third
6
party without any confidentiality obligations at the time of disclosure.
7
5.
This Protective Order shall apply to all Protected Information exchanged by any
8
Party, including, without limitation, Documents, things, other discovery materials, transcripts,
9
depositions, testimony, or other papers produced, filed, generated, or served by a Party in this
10
litigation.
11
6.
All Protected Information produced and designated as confidential hereunder shall
12
have stamped or affixed on each page that contains Protected Information the appropriate
13
confidentiality classification—either “CONFIDENTIAL,” “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL,”
14
“CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL:
15
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” — and the designation “Case No. 1:07-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
16
(E.D. Cal.)” at the time such materials, or copies thereof, are delivered to the receiving Party, or
17
within ten (10) court days thereafter in the event such labeling or marking is inadvertently
18
omitted. Until ten (10) court days have elapsed after receipt, the reviewing Party will treat
19
Documents and things that have been received and that have not been designated
20
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’
21
EYES ONLY” or “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” as if they
22
had been designated with the “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
23
“REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” classification. The parties
24
will use due care to designate as Protected Information only Documents or other materials that
25
truly encompass such information.
26
27
28
7.
Protected Information that has been classified as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL” may be disclosed only to the following:
A.
outside counsel for the receiving Party and their clerical and paralegal staffs and
litigation support providers (for example, outside copy services, coding and imaging vendors,
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
3
1
2
graphic art and visual aid providers, or jury consultants) whose duties and responsibilities require
3
access to Protected Information;
4
B.
Plaintiffs and Defendants;
5
C.
experts and consultants who are requested by counsel of the receiving Party to
6
7
8
furnish technical, legal, expert, or other specialized services in connection with this litigation;
D.
an officer before whom a deposition is taken, including stenographic reporters and
any necessary secretarial, clerical, or other lay personnel of such officer; and
9
E.
any other person to whom the parties agree in writing or as allowed by the Court.
10
8.
Protected Information that has been classified as “CONFIDENTIAL:
11
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES
12
ONLY” may be disclosed only to those persons identified in subparts A, C, D, and E of
13
Paragraph 7 above.
14
9.
No Protected Information shall be provided to any person identified in subpart B
15
or C of Paragraph 7 until each such person has been provided with a copy of this Protective
16
Order, reviewed it, and signed the Certification attached hereto as Exhibit A.
17
10.
Designations of Discovery
18
A.
Depositions may be designated as Protected Information in accordance with this
19
Order: (a) in the course of the deposition, orally on the record; or (b) by notifying the other Party
20
in writing, within ten (10) court days of receipt of the transcript by the parties, of the pages and
21
lines of the transcript that contain the Protected Information.
22
i.
All depositions shall presumptively be treated as Protected Information
23
marked with the “CONFIDENTIAL” designation in accordance with the
24
definition above and subject to this Order during the deposition and for a
25
period of ten (10) court days after a transcript of said deposition is received
26
by the Parties.
27
28
ii.
Counsel of record for the Designating Party may also request that all
persons other than the individuals specified in Paragraph 7 of this
Protective Order, as appropriate, leave the deposition room during the
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
4
1
2
portion of the deposition in which Protected Information is disclosed. If
3
the Protected Information disclosed is of the type identified by
4
subparagraph 4.D of Paragraph 4, counsel of record for the Designating
5
Party may request that all persons other than the individuals specified by
6
subparagraph A, C, D, and E of Paragraph 7, as appropriate, leave the
7
deposition room. The failure of such other persons to comply with a
8
request of this type shall constitute substantial justification for counsel of
9
record to advise the witness not to answer the question pending a ruling
from the Court on the issue.
10
iii.
11
Where appropriate in light of the amount of Protected Information likely to
12
be disclosed at a given deposition, counsel of record for the Parties may
13
agree at the beginning of the deposition that the entire transcript shall be
14
designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” subject to review of the transcript and
15
withdrawal of any unnecessary designation within ten (10) court days of
16
receipt of the transcript.
17
18
19
B.
Answers to interrogatories and requests for admission may also be designated
confidential by marking the Documents in a manner described in Paragraph 6 of this Order.
C.
Notwithstanding Paragraphs 7 and 8 above, other persons may be shown a specific
20
item of Protected Information of the producing Party if such persons are identified in that specific
21
item, or on any attachment thereto, as being the author, or as having previously received a copy of
22
an exact duplicate of said specific item.
23
D.
Notwithstanding Paragraph 7, other persons may be shown a specific item of
24
Protected Information designated CONFIDENTIAL or REDACTED & CONFIDENTIAL if such
25
persons are past or present employees of the producing Party.
26
11.
Documents Available for Inspection and Copying
27
A.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 6, all Documents and things that are
28
produced for initial inspection prior to copying and delivery shall presumptively be considered to
be designated Protected Information marked with the “CONFIDENTIAL” classification or, for
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
5
1
2
documents identified by subparagraph D of Paragraph 4, the “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’
3
EYES ONLY” classification, and shall be produced for inspection only by persons representing
4
the receiving Party who fall within at least one of the categories permitted under Paragraph 7 or,
5
for documents identified by subparagraph 4.D of Paragraph 4, only by persons representing the
6
receiving Party who fall within at least subparagraph A, C, or E of Paragraph 7, above.
7
B.
At the initial inspection of Documents and things, the receiving Party shall not
8
make copies of the Documents made available for inspection, and if notes are made therefrom
9
other than a list identifying Documents or things to be copied or otherwise furnished, the notes
10
shall be treated as Protected Information marked with the “CONFIDENTIAL” classification or,
11
for notes regarding documents identified by subparagraph D of paragraph 4, as Protected
12
Information marked with the “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” classification.
13
C.
After the receiving Party has selected Documents or things for copying, they shall
14
promptly be sequentially numbered (if not already done), copied, and the copies delivered to the
15
receiving Party by the producing Party (with the receiving Party paying only for the costs of its
16
copy set and delivery of such set). Before copies are delivered to the receiving Party, counsel for
17
the producing Party shall designate and mark each page of the Documents and things with the
18
appropriate confidentiality classification — either “CONFIDENTIAL,” “REDACTED &
19
CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “REDACTED &
20
CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” — and with the litigation case number (“Case
21
No. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal.)”) if and to the extent appropriate in accordance with
22
Paragraph 6 of this Protective Order. Copies of Documents and things delivered to the receiving
23
Party and not so marked shall be considered thereafter to be outside the restrictions imposed by
24
this Protective Order, except as provided in Paragraph 6.
25
12.
Compliance With Civil Local Rule 39-141
26
A.
All deposition transcripts, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, and other
27
Documents that have previously been designated by a Party as comprising or containing Protected
28
Information, or any pleading, brief, or memorandum purporting to reproduce or paraphrase such
material, shall be lodged with the Court for filing in accordance with Gen. L.R. 39-141.
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
6
1
2
3
4
B.
The confidential portions of Documents and things that are accepted for filing
under seal by the Court shall be treated in accordance with Gen. L.R. 39-141.
13.
If the receiving Party disagrees with the confidential or redacted status of any
5
Document or other material, or if the receiving Party disagrees with the level of confidentiality
6
classification, the receiving Party will notify and confer with the producing Party to request
7
reclassification of the Document or material. If no agreement has been reached within ten (10)
8
court days of such notification or a later date if agreed to in writing by the parties, the receiving
9
Party may thereafter make a request of the Court for an order reclassifying the confidentiality
10
designation and/or removing such Document or other material from the restrictions of this Order.
11
If such a request is made, the Party seeking to maintain a confidentiality classification bears the
12
burden of establishing that the restrictions of this Order apply to such Protected Information.
13
14.
In light of the Court’s June 24, 2011 order regarding Protected Information
14
identified by subparagraph D of Paragraph 4, if the parties cannot reach an agreement regarding
15
specific documents that fall within that category, the parties may seek in camera review of those
16
documents.
17
15.
Privileged Information and Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Information.
18
A.
Nothing in this Protective Order shall in and of itself require disclosure of
19
information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, or any other
20
privilege, doctrine, or immunity, nor does this Protective Order result in any Party giving up its
21
right to argue that otherwise privileged documents must be produced due to waiver or for any
22
other reason.
23
B.
Inadvertent production of information subject to the attorney-client and/or
24
attorney-work-product privileges shall not constitute a waiver of any claim for protection under
25
the privileges, provided that the provisions of this paragraph are satisfied.
26
i.
If the Producing Party discovers that information produced in discovery
27
should have been withheld on the basis of privilege, the Producing Party
28
must provide written notice to all other Parties as soon as is reasonably
practicable. In such event, the Parties must immediately: (a) return the
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
7
1
2
privileged information along with all duplicates to the Producing Party; or
3
(b) destroy the originals and all copies of the privileged information. The
4
Producing Party shall designate which of these approaches the Parties must
5
follow. Once notified of the production of privileged information, the
6
Receiving Party shall not duplicate the privileged information, nor
7
distribute the privileged information by any means other than returning it to
8
the Producing Party or destroying it consistent with this Paragraph. In
9
addition, once notified of the production of privileged information, the
10
Receiving Party shall, if such material has previously been disclosed to
11
others by the Receiving Party, take reasonable steps to obtain all such
12
previously disclosed material and advise such persons of the claims of
13
privilege. Within fifteen (15) days of notifying all other Parties, the
14
Producing Party must provide a privilege log to all Parties that lists the
15
privileged information. The Receiving Party shall have no liability, under
16
this Order or otherwise, for any disclosure or use of privileged information
17
occurring before the Receiving Party was placed on notice of the Producing
18
Party's claims of privilege, provided the Receiving Party did not know that
19
the information was privileged.
ii.
20
If the Receiving Party has a reasonable basis to believe that information
21
produced in discovery should have been withheld on the basis of privilege,
22
the Receiving Party has an affirmative obligation to provide written notice
23
to the Producing Party. The Receiving Party must provide such written
24
notice within a reasonable time period after identifying the information as
25
privileged, but in any event, no later than seven (7) days after it discovers
26
that privileged information was inadvertently produced.
27
28
16.
A third party from whom discovery is sought in this litigation (“the Third Party”)
may produce Protected Information entitled to the protections afforded by this Order as follows:
A.
The Third Party shall be given a copy of this Order;
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
8
1
B.
2
3
Party’s counsel, the protections afforded by this Order;
C.
4
5
The Third Party shall request, in writing addressed to the propounding
The Third Party shall produce any Protected Information in the manner
described in Paragraphs 6, 10, and/or 11;
D.
6
The Third Party’s Protected Information produced in such manner may be
7
disclosed only to the persons identified in Paragraphs 7, 8, 10.C or 10.D, depending on how the
8
Protected Information is designated;
E.
9
10
material produced by the Third Party;
F.
11
12
The Third Party is entitled to the protections against inadvertent disclosure
found in Paragraph 15;
G.
13
14
Paragraphs 13 and 14 set the procedures for disputing classification of
Following the termination of this Action, the Third Party’s Protected
Information shall be treated as described in Paragraph 18; and
H.
15
Before any modification of the Order pursuant to Paragraph 20 that might
16
affect the Third Party’s rights under this Order, the Third Party is entitled to notice and an
17
opportunity to object.
18
17.
If Protected Information produced in accordance with this Order is disclosed to
19
any person other than in the manner authorized by this Order, the Party responsible for the
20
disclosure shall immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of
21
all counsel of record and, without prejudice to other rights and remedies available to the
22
producing Party, make every effort to obtain the return of the disclosed Protected Information and
23
prevent further disclosure of it by the person who was the recipient of such information.
24
18.
Any person who, prior to official production of documents as signified by Bates
25
numbers being applied to those documents, has reviewed or accessed another Party’s raw
26
electronic data that is ultimately deemed by agreement of the Parties or judicial determination to
27
be non-responsive or irrelevant to the claims in this litigation shall be prohibited from using any
28
such raw electronic discovery deemed non-responsive or irrelevant for any other purpose,
including but not limited to further investigation, initiation of a separate lawsuit, representation in
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
9
1
2
a separate lawsuit, or referral for initiation of a separate lawsuit. Before beginning review of the
3
other Party’s raw electronic data, the receiving Party shall first identify any person who will be
4
reviewing the raw electronic data.
5
19.
Unless otherwise agreed or ordered by the Court, within ninety (90) calendar days
6
after the termination of this Action, Case No. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal.), including
7
any and all appeals therefrom, attorneys for the receiving Party shall destroy all Protected
8
Information received from the other parties to this litigation or third parties hereunder, and
9
provide the other parties with written verification of such destruction. Notwithstanding this
10
provision, outside counsel for each Party may maintain for archival purposes one copy of all
11
pleadings, transcripts, exhibits and written discovery responses, including portions designated
12
under this Protective Order. Prompt written notice shall be given to a Party who produced
13
Protected Information hereunder if that Party’s Protected Information is sought by any person not
14
a party to this litigation, by subpoena in another action, or by service with any legal process. Any
15
person seeking such Protected Information who takes action to enforce such subpoena or other
16
legal process shall be apprised of this Order.
17
20.
This Order may be changed only by the written agreement of the parties or further
18
order of the Court, and is without prejudice to the rights of a Party to seek relief from or variation
19
of any of its provisions.
20
21.
Subject to Paragraph 18 above, the remaining provisions of this Order, including
21
the obligations to maintain confidentiality embodied herein, shall survive the final disposition of
22
this litigation and continue in full force and effect.
23
Dated: March 23, 2012
24
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
BROOKS M. BEARD
DANIEL A. ZLATNIK
25
26
By: /s/ Brooks M. Beard
Brooks M. Beard
27
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RYAN COUCH and
KENNETH JIMENEZ
28
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
10
1
2
Dated: March 23, 2012
EDWARD J. CADEN
LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD J. CADEN
3
By:
4
/s/ Edward J. Caden
Edward J. Caden
5
Attorney for Plaintiffs RYAN COUCH and
KENNETH JIMENEZ
6
7
Dated: March 23, 2012
8
9
10
11
KAMALA D. HARRIS.
Attorney General of the State of California
SCOTT H. WYCKOFF
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MARY HORST
Deputy Attorney General
WILLIAM H. LITTLEWOOD
Deputy Attorney General
12
By:
13
14
/s/ Mary Horst
Mary Horst
Attorneys for Defendants TOMMY WAN,
KIMBERLI BONCORE, AND RALPH DIAZ
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: 27 March 2012
19
/s/ Dennis
L. Beck
HON. DENNIS L. BECK
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
11
1
EXHIBIT A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
12
1
CERTIFICATION
2
3
4
5
I, __________________________, residing at __________________________________,
___________________________, being duly sworn according to law, state as follows:
1.
I understand that information or Documents designated “Protected Information”
6
will be provided to me in accordance with the terms and conditions and restrictions of the
7
Protective Order (“Protective Order”), dated __________________, entered in the lawsuit styled
8
Couch v. Wan, et al., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Civil Action No.
9
1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB (the “Litigation”);
10
11
12
2.
I have been given a copy of and have read and understand the Protective Order,
and I hereby agree to be bound by its terms;
3.
I further agree that I shall not disclose to others, except in accordance with the
13
terms and conditions of the Protective Order, such Protected Information and that such Protected
14
Information shall be used only for the purposes of the Litigation;
15
16
17
4.
I further understand that my obligation to honor the confidentiality of such
Protected Information will continue even after the Litigation terminates;
5.
I further agree and attest to my understanding that, in the event that I fail to abide
18
by the terms of the Protective Order, I may be subject to sanctions imposed by the Court for such
19
a failure, including sanctions by way of contempt of court, and a claim for damages by the party
20
producing the Protected Information disclosed to me;
21
6.
For purposes of enforcing this Protective Order, I hereby consent to the
22
jurisdiction of the federal courts and state courts in California, and agree that service by mail or
23
personal service of any notice, order, or proceeding in connection therewith shall be valid service
24
upon me;
25
7.
26
I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true and correct under
penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California.
27
28
Executed on: ___________________
[PROPOSED] THIRD AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01621-LJO-DLB
sf-3123945
By: _____________________________
13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?