Couch v. State of California, et al

Filing 254

ORDER After 253 Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/3/2013. (This Court ORDERS the parties, no later than February 15, 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. All pending matters and dates are VACATED.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RYAN COUCH, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, vs. CASE NO. CV F 08-1621 LJO DLB ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT (Doc. 253.) 10 TOMMY WAN, et al., 11 12 Defendants. ____________________________/ 13 Plaintiffs’ counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. 14 Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than February 15, 15 2013, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause 16 why the action has not been dismissed. 17 This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the April 9, 2013 pretrial 18 conference and June 4, 2013 trial. This Court suspends all briefing on the pending summary judgment 19 motion and will take no further action on the summary judgment motion, unless this Court orders 20 otherwise. 21 Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or 22 parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. 23 ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems 25 appropriate. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 3, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?