Packs v. Adams et al
Filing
73
ORDER Following Telephonic Hearing and GRANTING Defendants' Request for Video Appearance by Inmate Dixon at Trial, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/7/2011. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CHARLES AUSTIN PARKS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01628-LJO-SMS PC
ORDER FOLLOWING TELEPHONIC
HEARING, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR VIDEO APPEARANCE BY
INMATE DIXON AT TRIAL
v.
BRASWELL, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
On July 7, 2011, a telephonic status hearing was held to address Defendants’ request to allow
17
Inmate Dixon, CDC #V-96657, to appear by video to testify at the trial in this matter. Pelican Bay
18
State Prison has requested that Inmate Dixon be allowed to testify by video due to safety and medical
19
concerns in transferring him to another institution. Plaintiff, on the record, expressed no opposition
20
or objection. Defendants request shall be granted and defense counsel is to contact Mark Richmond
21
at (559) 499-5635 to arrange Inmate Dixon’s video appearance at trial on July 18, 2011.
22
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
24
Defendants’ request to allow Inmate Dixon, CDC # V-96657, to testify by video
conference at trial is GRANTED; and
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2.
Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the video testimony of Inmate
2
Dixon at trial on July 18, 2011, by coordinating with Pelican Bay State Prison and
3
Mark Richmond.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
b9ed48
July 7, 2011
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?