Gaston v. Terronez
Filing
62
ORDER Directing Clerk to Re-Serve Second Informational Order with RAND Notice Upon Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/9/12. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ANTHONY GASTON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TERRONEZ, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
1:08-cv-01629 GSA PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RESERVE SECOND INFORMATIONAL
ORDER WITH RAND NOTICE ON
PLAINTIFF
17
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983.
18
On May 18, 2012, Defendants filed motions for summary judgment. By this motion, Defendants seek
19
judgment as a matter of law, closing this action in its entirety.
20
On May 27, 2009, the Court issued the Second Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice,
21
and Summary Judgment Notice in this action, providing Plaintiff with notice pursuant to Rand v.
22
Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), advising Plaintiff of his rights and responsibilities to oppose a
23
motion to dismiss such as that filed by Defendants in this action. At this juncture, Plaintiff shall be
24
provided with another copy of the Order/Notice. Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012 WL
25
2626912 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012). Plaintiff is advised to immediately review the Order/Notice in its
26
entirety for information pertaining to his opposition to Defendants' pending motion to dismiss.
27
///
28
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve another copy of the Second
Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice and Summary Judgment Notice upon Plaintiff, for his
review.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated:
6i0kij
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
July 9, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?