Aquino v. Ugwveze et al

Filing 48

ORDER GRANTING Motions 44 , 45 & 46 Requesting the Court to rule on Defendants 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DENYING 44 Motion for Complimentary Ddocket Sheets, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/13/2010. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Aquino v. Ugwveze et al Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Dorian M. Aquino ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Before the Court are three motions from Plaintiff requesting the Court to rule on Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment will be ruled on in due course. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions will be granted. Plaintiff's August 20, 2010, filing also requests "complimentary docket sheets" for this case. Plaintiff is advised that the Court does not distribute "complimentary docket sheets" and does not provide copying or mailing services for litigants. Plaintiff is also advised that his motion requesting the Court to rule on prior motions does not expedite the legal process and may only cause further delay as it adds unnecessary filings to the docket. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motions requesting the Court to rule on Defendant's motion for summary judgment are GRANTED. The Court will rule on Defendant's motion in due time; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DORIAN M. AQUINO, Plaintiff, v. DR. GODWIN UGVEZE, et. al., Defendants. / CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01639-AWI-SKO PC ORDER RE MOTIONS (Doc. 44, 45, 46) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Plaintiff's request for complimentary docket sheets is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj December 13, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?