Branch v. Grannis, et al.,

Filing 215

TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/2/16: Telephonic Pretrial Confirmation Hearing set for 12/2/2016 at 9:30 a.m.; Telephonic Motions in Limine Hearing set for 1/17/2017 at 2:00 p.m.; Jury Trial set for 1/30/2017 at 8:30 a.m., Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LOUIS BRANCH,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
D. UMPHENOUR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB- PC
TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Telephonic Pretrial Confirmation Hearing:
December 2, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.
Telephonic Motions in Limine Hearing:
January 17, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
Jury Trial: Monday January 30, 2017,
at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days

Plaintiff Louis Branch is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

20

This action is proceeding against Defendants Umphenour, Szalai, and Alvarez for failure to

21

protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Umphenour for

22

retaliation in violation of the First Amendment.1 This matter was set for a telephonic hearing on June

23
24
1

25
26
27
28

On May 31, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal of the April 1, 2016, order denying his motion to withdraw consent
to proceed before a magistrate judge and the May 5, 2016, order denying his motion for reconsideration of the April 1,
2016, order. (ECF No. 206.) “When a Notice of Appeal is defective in that it refers to a non-appealable interlocutory
order, it does not transfer jurisdiction to the appellate court, and so the ordinary rule that the district court cannot act until
the mandate has issued on appeal does not apply.” Nascimento v. Dummer, 508 F.3d 905, 908 (9th Cir. 2007). The order
Plaintiff is appealing is not immediately appealable. See State of California on Behalf of California Dep’t of Toxic
Substances Control v. Campbell, 38 F.3d 772, 776-77 (9th Cir. 1998) (“an order that adjudicates less than all claims” is not
a final decision); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 335 (9th Cir. 1990) (order dismissing claim not

1

1

1, 2016, at 11:30 a.m. for purposes of a setting a date for trial. The matter is now set for a two to

2

three day jury trial beginning on January 30, 2017, at 8 :30 a.m.

3

In preparation of trial, the parties are required to file Pretrial Statements in accordance with the

4

schedule set forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial

5

statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized

6

showing in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making

7

such a showing are outlined in detail below.

8

1.

Pretrial Statement (Local Rule 281)

9

Pursuant to Local Rule 281, the parties shall file a Pretrial Statement. Plaintiff shall file his

10

Pretrial Statement no later than November 21, 2016. Defendants shall file their Pretrial Statement no

11

later than November 28, 2016. The Telephonic Trial Confirmation hearing will be held on December

12

2, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9.

13

The form and content of the Pretrial Statement must comply with Local Rule 281. Pursuant to

14

Local Rule 281(b), the Pretrial Statement shall including the following matters, under the following

15

captions, and in the following order:

16
17
18
19

(1)

Jurisdiction – Venue. The factual and statutory basis of federal jurisdiction and venue

and whether there is any dispute concerning jurisdiction or venue;
(2)

Jury – Non-Jury. Whether the party has demanded a jury trial of all or any of the

issues or, if not, whether a demand for jury trial made by any other party is conceded or contested;

20

(3)

Undisputed Facts. A plain, concise statement of the facts that are undisputed;

21

(4)

Disputed Factual Issues. A plain, concise statement of each fact (and any related

22
23

essential facts) that the party claims or concedes to be in dispute;
(5)

Disputed Evidentiary Issues. A plain, concise summary of any reasonably anticipated

24

disputes concerning admissibility of live and deposition testimony, physical and demonstrative

25

evidence and the use of special technology at trial, including computer animation, video discs, and

26
27
28

immediately appealable because it “may be fully and effectively reviewed after final judgment”). Therefore, the Court
retains jurisdiction over this matter.

2

1

other high technology, and a statement whether each such dispute should be resolved by motion in

2

limine, briefed in the trial, brief, or addressed in some other manner;

3

(6)

Special Factual Information in Certain Actions. In addition to the facts and issues

4

described in (3) through (5), the following special information with respect to the following types of

5

actions shall be specified within either the disputed or undisputed facts sections as appropriate:
(A)

6

The date, place, and general nature of the incident; the particular acts,

7

omissions, or conditions constituting the basis for liability; the particular acts, omissions or conditions

8

constituting the basis of any defense; any statute, ordinance, or regulation violated by either party; the

9

applicability of the doctrine of strict liability or res ipsa loquitur.
(B)

10

Plaintiff’s age; injuries sustained; any prior injury or condition worsened;

11

periods of hospitalization; medical expenses and estimated future medical expenses; the period of total

12

and/or partial disability; annual, monthly, or weekly earnings before the incident; earnings loss to date

13

and estimated diminution of future earnings power; property damage; general damages; punitive

14

damages;

15

(7)

Relief Sought. The elements of monetary damage, if any, and the specific nature of any

16

other relief sought;

17

(8)

Points of Law. A statement of the legal theory or theories of recovery or of defense

18

and of any points of law (substantive or procedural) that are or may reasonably be expected to be in

19

controversy, citing the pertinent statues, ordinances, regulations, cases, and other authorities relied

20

upon. Extended legal argument is not required in the pretrial statement;

21
22
23

(9)

Abandoned Issues. A statement of all issues raised by the pleadings that have been

abandoned, including, for example, claims for relief and affirmative defenses;
(10)

Witnesses. A list (names and addresses) of all prospective witnesses, whether offered

24

in person or by deposition or interrogatory, designating those who are expert witnesses. Only

25

witnesses so listed will be permitted to testify at the trial, except as may be otherwise provided in the

26

pretrial order;

27
28
3

1

(11)

Exhibits – Schedules and Summaries. A list of documents or other exhibits that the

2

party expects to offer at trial. Only exhibits so listed will be permitted to be offered at trial except as

3

may be otherwise provided in the pretrial order.

4
5
6

(12)

Discovery Documents. A list of all portions of depositions, answers to interrogatories,

and responses to requests for admission that the party expects to offer at trial;
(13)

Further Discovery or Motions. Any requests for further discovery or pretrial

7

motions. Whether discovery and/or law and motion has been terminated by a Court order, counsel

8

shall set forth the grounds for relief from that order and why a motion to be relieved was not made

9

before the date ordered in the status conference for termination. Motions for relief at pretrial are not

10

favored and will ordinarily be denied unless the moving party makes a strong showing;

11

(14)

Stipulations. Any stipulations requested or offered for pretrial or trial purposes;

12

(15)

Amendments – Dismissals. Any requested amendments to pleadings, dismissals,

13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

additions or subtractions of parties, or dispositions as to defaulting parties;
(16)

Settlement Negotiations. A statement whether settlement negotiations between parties

and/or a court settlement conference under L.R. 270 would be helpful;
(17)

Agreed Statements. A statement whether presentation of all or part of the action upon

an Agreed Statement of Facts is feasible and advisable;
(18)

Separate Trial of Issues. A statement whether separate trial of any of the issues is

feasible and advisable;
(19)

Impartial Experts – Limitation of Experts. A statement whether appointment by the

Court of impartial expert witnesses or limitation of the number of experts witnesses is advisable;
(20)

Attorneys’ Fees. A statement whether attorney’s fees are sought and the time and

manner in which they are to be ascertained. See L.R. 293;
(21)

Trial Exhibits. Any special handling of trial exhibits and a statement of advisability of

court retention of exhibits pending appeal decision. See L.R. 138(e);
(22)

Trial Protective Order. Whether a trial protective order will be sought pursuant to

L.R. 141.1(b)(2); and

28
4

1

(23)

Miscellaneous. Any other appropriate comments, suggestions, or information that

2

might aid in the disposition of the action, including references to any matters set forth in Fed. R. Civ.

3

P. 16(c).

4
5

A party’s failure to comply with any of these pretrial statement requirements may result
in the Court’s excluding witnesses, evidence and/or legal issues related to the case at trial.

6

2.

7

If either party desires to include expert witnesses at trial, they must comply with the disclosure

8
9

Disclosure of Expert Witnesses:

and timelines requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(2)(2) and (a)(2)(D).
3.

Plaintiff’s Witness Procedures:

10

Because the Plaintiff is an incarcerated state prisoner, the plaintiff must comply with certain

11

procedures associated with introducing evidence and bringing witnesses to trial. A failure to comply

12

with these requirements will result in an exclusion of witnesses and/or trial evidence and will not

13

be just cause for continuance of the trial date.

14

Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of the alleged facts that support

15

the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2)

16

the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to produce all of the evidence to prove his

17

case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call

18

witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial

19

and available to testify. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the procedures set forth below

20

may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses named in his pretrial statement. Notwithstanding

21

the requirements set forth herein, a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses will only be

22

granted by the Court if the moving party has shown the witnesses have relevant information and the

23

Court determines the witnesses’ presence will substantially further the resolution of the case. Wiggins

24

v. Cnty. Of Alameda, 717 F.2d 466, 468 n.1 (9th Cir. 1983). The decision to grant or deny the motion

25

is within the discretion of the trial judge.

26

The following procedures are required to ensure the attendance of Plaintiff’s witnesses at trial.

27

The witnesses may be incarcerated or unincarcerated and willing or unwilling to testify voluntarily.

28

Plaintiff should carefully review the procedures set forth below for filing motions based on the
5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

different circumstances of each individual witness.
a.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to
Testify Voluntarily

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot come to
court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be transported to
court. The Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied that the prospective witness has
actual knowledge of relevant facts.
A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed
voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for a court order requiring that such
witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must: (1) state the name, address, and
prison identification number of each such witness; and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing
that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.
The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”
The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party
himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has informed
the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in which declaration
the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the party of this willingness; or
(2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective
witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed.
The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways:
(1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an
ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time,
Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may swear to the
cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that
the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration signed
under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to
which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the declaration is made by the party
or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who
6

1

was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what

2

occurred at the time it occurred.

3

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,

4

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will issue

5

the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court.

6

Plaintiff shall file any motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who are

7

willing to testify, on or before October 10, 2016. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before

8

October 24, 2016.

9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

b.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to
Testify Voluntarily

If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify
voluntarily, the party must submit a motion for the attendance of such witnesses. An incarcerated
witness cannot come to court unless the Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the
witness to be transported to court. The Court will not issue an order unless it is satisfied that the
prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. In addition, the party must indicate in the
motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify voluntarily.
The motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison identification number of each such
witness; and (2) be accompanied by a showing that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant
facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.”
The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways:
(1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eyewitness or an
ear-witness to the relevant facts (e.g., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time,
Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may swear to the
cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that
the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration signed
under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to
which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the declaration is made by the party
or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the incident, when and where it occurred, who
7

1

was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what

2

occurred at the time it occurred.

3

The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,

4

specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will issue

5

the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court.

6

c.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to
Testify Voluntarily

It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated witness’s voluntary
attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought or obtained
from the Court. However, the parties are advised that if a witness subsequently refuses to testify prior
to trial, the Court will not continue the trial date to allow the party to compel the attendance of the
witness at trial, absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
d.

Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to
Testify Voluntarily

14
If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify voluntarily, the

15
witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the party seeking the
16

witness’s presence must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an

17
unincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the
18

witness’s travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.

19
If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more unincarcerated witnesses who refuse
20
to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and location of each
21
unincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each unincarcerated witness
22
and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff must then, for each witness, submit a money order
23

made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witness’s travel expenses plus the daily witness

24
fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the unincarcerated witness by the United States
25
Marshal unless the money order is tendered to the Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of
26
public funds for these expenses in civil cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is
27
required even if the party was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
28
8

1

If Plaintiff wishes to have the United States Marshal serve any unincarcerated witnesses

2

who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money orders to the Court no later

3

than December 5, 2016. In order to ensure timely submission of the money orders, Plaintiff

4

must notify the Court of the names and locations of his witnesses, on or before November 28,

5

2016.

6

3.

Motions In Limine Hearing and Briefing Schedule

7

Any party may file a motion in limine, which is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance

8

testimony or evidence in a particular area. United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir.

9

2009). In the case of a jury trial, the Court’s ruling gives Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel advance

10

notice of the scope of certain evidence so that admissibility is settled before attempted use of the

11

evidence before the jury. Id. at 1111-1112. Although the Federal Rules do not explicitly provide for

12

the filing of motions in limine, the Court has the inherent power to hear and decide such motions as a

13

function of its duty to expeditiously manage trials by eliminating evidence that is clearly inadmissible

14

for any purpose. Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 n.4 (1984).

15

This Court further orders the parties to file motions in limine only with respect to important,

16

critical issues. Motions in limine on abstract evidentiary issues or issues more appropriately addressed

17

by the Court on a case-by-case basis (such as a motion in limine to exclude all irrelevant evidence)

18

will be looked upon with disfavor. After satisfying the forgoing, if a motion in limine still seeks to

19

address the admissibility of a particular trial exhibit, the exhibit in question must be referenced by the

20

trial exhibit number so that the court can review the actual exhibit for admissibility. If the exhibit

21

sought to be admitted would not be in the court’s possession one week prior to the motion in limine

22

hearing, then the exhibit in question must be included in the motion. Failure to properly reference or

23

attach an exhibit in the motion will result in the request being denied.

24

The parties shall not file separate motions in limine for every issue presented to the Court.

25

Rather, if a party wishes to file a motion in limine, each party shall file one consolidated motion in

26

limine which is subdivided into separate sections for each issue setting for the legal authority and

27

analysis. The responding party shall file one opposition in response addressing each motion in limine

28

issue in a separate section.
9

1

The deadline for service and filing of motions in limine is December 27, 2016. The deadline

2

for service and filing of an opposition, if any, is due January 9, 2017. A telephonic motions in limine

3

hearing will be held on January 17, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, before the undersigned.

4

Counsel for defendants is directed to arrange for telephone contact with Plaintiff and to contact the

5

Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at [phone], prior to the hearing date, to receive

6

instructions regarding the conference call.

7

4.

8

As noted below, no later than December 12, 2016, the parties shall exchange their final

9

exhibit list and pre-marked exhibits, to be addressed at the January 17, 2017, motion in limine

10

Pre-Marked and Exchange of Exhibits

hearing.

11

All exhibits must be pre-marked with an exhibit sticker or other legible numbering/lettering.

12

This requirement that exhibits be pre-marked applies both to evidence that will be formally admitted

13

into evidence as well as any other exhibits that will be presented in any manner during trial, such as

14

“demonstrative” evidence. Each individual “original” exhibit that will be submitted to the jury must

15

be stapled/fastened so that the exhibit does not become separated. Further, exhibits submitted to the

16

jury must be pre-marked on the front page only in the manner described above. Impeachment or

17

rebuttal evidence need not be pre-marked. However, evidence of bias, extrinsically introduced, must

18

be pre-marked.

19

a.

Joint Exhibits: Joint exhibits are those exhibits which all parties agree may be

20

admitted into evidence without the need for laying a proper foundation under

21

the Federal Rules of Evidence. Joint exhibits must be pre-marked with the

22

designation “J-[Number]” (e.g., J-1, J-2). Those exhibits may be introduced at

23

any time during the course of the trial.

24

“automatically” admitted into evidence: at least one of the parties must admit a

25

joint exhibit into evidence. If an exhibit is not admitted by any party, the

26

exhibit will not be given to the jury despite its “joint” designation as an exhibit.

27
28

b.

However, joint exhibits are not

Plaintiff’s Exhibits: Plaintiff’s exhibits must be pre-marked using numbers
beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2, etc.).
10

c.

1

Defendant’s Exhibits: Defendant’s exhibits must be pre-marked using letters
beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C...AA, BB, CC...AAA, BBB, CCC, etc.).

2
3

No later than December 12, 2016, the parties shall exchange their proposed exhibits to allow

4

for the parties to file objections to be addressed at the motion in limine hearing on January 17, 2017.

5

Because Plaintiff is incarcerated, he shall submit his exhibits to the Litigation Coordinator at the

6

Institution where he is incarcerated, on or before the above-referenced deadline. Further instructions

7

on the submission and use of exhibits during trial will be provided in the pretrial order in this matter.

8

Defendants are required to submit trial exhibits for both parties in binders. Counsel shall

9

submit two (2) complete, legible and identical sets of exhibits in binders on or about January 9,

10

2017. Within the binders, the pre-marked exhibits must be separately tabbed and assembled in

11

sequential order. All of Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be marked sequentially beginning with 1 (e.g., 1, 2,

12

etc.). All of Defendants’ exhibits shall be marked sequentially beginning with A (e.g., A, B, C…AA,

13

BB, CC…AAA, BBB, CCC, etc.). The binders shall be delivered to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Mamie

14

Hernandez prior to trial at a date set forth in the pretrial order.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER

15
16

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

17

1.

18
19

This matter is set for telephonic pretrial confirmation hearing before the Honorable

Stanley A. Boone on December 2, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9;
2.

Motions in limine are due on or before December 27, 2016. Oppositions to the

20

motions in limine are due on or before January 9, 2017. This matter is set for motion in limine

21

hearing before the Honorable Stanley A. Boone on January 17, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9;

22
23
24

3.

This matter is set for jury trial before the Honorable Stanley A. Boone on January 30,

2017 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9;
4.

Counsel for Defendants is required to arrange for the participation of Plaintiff in the

25

telephonic trial confirmation hearing and motion in limine hearing and to contact Courtroom Deputy,

26

Mamie Hernandez, at [phone], prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the

27

conference call;

28

5.

Plaintiff shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or before
11

1

November 21, 2016;
6.

2
3

before November 28, 2016.
7.

4
5

Defendants shall serve and file a pretrial statement as described in this order on or

In addition to electronically filing their pretrial statement, Defendants shall e-mail the

pretrial statement to: [e-mail];
8.

6

If Plaintiff intends to call incarcerated witnesses at time of trial, Plaintiff shall serve and

7

file a motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses as described in this order on or before October

8

10, 2016;

9

9.

10

The opposition to the motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, shall

be filed on or before October 24, 2016; and
10.

11

If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of unincarcerated witnesses who refuse to

12

testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must notify the Court of their names and locations on or before November

13

28, 2016, and Plaintiff must submit the money orders, as described in subsection 4 of this order, to the

14

Court on or before December 5, 2016.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17

Dated:

18

June 2, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12