Branch v. Grannis, et al.,

Filing 389

ORDER for Parties to SHOW CAUSE why Sanctions Should not be Imposed for Failure to File Pretrial Statements signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/20/2023. Show Cause Response due within Five-Days. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 LOUIS BRANCH, 5 Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, 6 ORDER FOR PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE PRETRIAL STATEMENTS v. 7 D. UMPHENOUR, 8 (ECF No. 386) Defendant. 9 10 Louis Branch (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 11 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 12 This case is currently set for jury trial on May 23, 2023. (ECF No. 386.) The parties 13 pretrial statements were due on or before March 14, 2023, and the pretrial conference is 14 scheduled for April 7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. (Id.) 15 Although Defendant filed a motion to modify the scheduling order on March 17, 2023 16 (ECF No. 387), neither party has filed their pretrial statements and the deadline has passed.1 17 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. Within five (5) days, the parties shall file their respective pretrial statements AND 19 show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with a 20 court order. Local Rule 110. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 20, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1 If the parties believe a settlement conference would be beneficial, they are encouraged to reach out to the Court to schedule a conference. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?