Cramer v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 26 Motion to Name Party Previously Designated as a Doe and to Direct Service on Such Party signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/22/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 v. 13 TARGET CORPORATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for damages and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. On October 20, 2009, the Court determined that it was appropriate to name Clevon Wheaton (previously designated as a "John Doe" defendant) as a defendant and to direct service upon Wheaton. On October 21, 2009, Plaintiff filed another motion for the same relief concerning Clevon Wheaton (Doc. 26). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for an order to serve Clevon ///// 1 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-cv-01693-OWW-SMS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO NAME PARTY PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED AS A DOE AND TO DIRECT SERVICE ON SUCH PARTY (Doc. 26) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Wheaton as a party previously designated as a John Doe defendant, filed on October 21, 2009, IS DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 October 22, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?