Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 11

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/10/10: Recommending that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims which relief may be granted under section 1983; and The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Kashley Roy Williams; Objections to F&R due by 2/16/2010. (Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Kashley Roy Williams ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on November 10, 2008. (Doc. 1.) On November 10, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc. 8.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned HEREBY RECOMMENDS that: 1. This action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and 1 v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. KASHLEY ROY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 1:08-cv-01713-AWI-SMS-PC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 1.) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 January 10, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2