Falls v. Yates

Filing 77

ORDER Disregarding Petitioner's Motion to Exceed Page Limits 76 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/13/11. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7

DAVID ALLEN FALLS,

8

Petitioner,

9
10

v.
JAMES A. YATES,

11

Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:08-CV-01729 OWW-DLB HC
ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S
MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS
(Doc. 76)

12
13
14

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

15

On March 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”)

16

which noted that objections to the F&R were due within thirty days. See Doc. 72. On April 22,

17

2011, the Court granted Petitioner’s motion for extension of time providing Petitioner additional

18

time to file his objections.

19

On April 25, 2011, Petitioner filed the instant motion requesting permission to exceed

20

“applicable” page limits. See Doc 76. In accordance with the Eastern District’s Local Rules, there

21

are no page limitations imposed on objections responding to a Magistrate Judge’s F&R. Petitioner is

22

advised that it is in his best interest to set forth his objections as clearly and concisely as possible.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to expand page limits is

24

unnecessary and therefore DISREGARDED.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:
fc2c0d

May 13, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
U .S. D istrict C ourt
E. D . C alifornia

1