Knapp v. Cate, et al.
Filing
52
ORDER Granting 47 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Knapp, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/5/11. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01779-SMS PC
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
KNAPP
v.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 47)
Defendants.
/
14
15
I.
Procedural History
16
Plaintiff Eric Charles Rodney Knapp (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and
17
in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on
18
November 20, 2008. On February 14, 2011, and order was issued appointing Amy K. Guerra as
19
counsel for the limited purpose of providing Plaintiff with assistance to present his argument for a
20
temporary restraining order and, if appropriate, drafting and filing an amended complaint. (ECF No.
21
46.).
22
On March 10, 2011, counsel contacted the pro bono program director for the Eastern District
23
of California and informed the program director that circumstances had changed and she would be
24
unable to represent Plaintiff in this action. On March 16, 2011, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion
25
seeking to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. (ECF No. 47.) More than twenty-one days have passed
26
and Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
27
II.
28
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff
Plaintiff’s counsel seeks to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff due to changed
1
1
circumstances that have impaired her ability to effectively represent Plaintiff in this action. Ms.
2
Guerra is an attorney working for Alternative Defense Counsel, conflict counsel, for the County of
3
Fresno. Shortly after being appointed as counsel in this action her caseload was greatly increased
4
due to an unexpected staffing change in the office. This included a greatly increased trial caseload
5
causing her to be
6
An attorney who has appeared on behalf of a party in an action may not withdraw leaving the
7
client in propria persona without leave of court. Local Rule 182. Counsel has not made an
8
appearance in this action and notified the Court of the need to withdraw shortly after receiving
9
appointment. Plaintiff has not opposed Counsel's motion to withdraw. Therefore, good cause
10
appearing, Counsel's motion to withdraw shall be granted.
11
III.
CONCLUSION
12
Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1.
Amy Guerra’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff, filed on March 16, 2011,
14
is GRANTED.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated:
cm411
May 5, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?