United States of America v. Organic Pastures Dairy Company LLC et al

Filing 56

ORDER to Extend Deadlines to File Opposition to and Reply in Support of Motion to Reopen Case and Petition for an Order to Show Cause Why Raw Farm LLC F/K/A Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC, Mark Mcafee and Aaron Mcafee Should Not be Held in Civil Contempt, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/7/2023. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Robin B. Ratner, Esq. (SBN 195788) rratner@structurelaw.com STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP 1801 Century Park E., Suite 475 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 818-7500 Facsimile: (408) 441-7501 Attorneys for Defendants Raw Farm, LLC fka Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark McAfee; and Non-Party Aaron McAfee 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. ORGANIC PASTURES DAIRY COMPANY, LLC, a corporation, and MARK McAFEE, an individual, 17 Defendants. 18 19 CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01786-JLT-SAB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION TO AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REOPEN CASE AND PETITION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RAW FARM, LLC F/K/A ORGANIC PASTURES DAIRY COMPANY, LLC; MARK MCAFEE; AND AARON MCAFEE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT HEARING DATE: June 9, 2023 TIME: 9:30 AM PLACE: Courtroom 4, Fresno JUDGE: Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston 20 21 22 STIPULATION 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 143(a)(1), it is hereby stipulated by and between 24 Defendants Raw Farm, LLC fka Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark 25 McAfee; and Non-Party Aaron McAfee (collectively, “Raw Farm”) and Plaintiff 26 United States Of America’s (“Plaintiff”) as follows: 27 28 1. On March 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Motion To Reopen Case (the “Motion”) And Petition For An Order To Show Cause Why Raw Farm, LLC f/k/a -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY 1 Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark McAfee; And Aaron McAfee Should 2 Not Be Held In Civil Contempt (the “Petition”). 3 4 5 2. Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition is currently April 10, 2023. 3. Due to Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and 6 Petition falling over the Passover and Easter holiday period, the Parties jointly agree 7 and hereby stipulate to a one-week extension for Raw Farm to file their response to 8 Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition, pursuant to Court approval. 9 10 11 12 13 14 4. With a one-week extension, Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition would be April 17, 2023. 5. The Parties further jointly agree and hereby stipulate a one-week extension for Plaintiff to file its Reply Brief corresponding to the same. 6. With a one-week extension, Plaintiff’s deadline to file a Reply brief in support of its Motion and Petition would be April 27, 2023. 15 7. There has been no previous extension of time requested or granted for 16 these deadlines. 17 8. This extension is not to delay this matter, but to allow the Parties 18 adequate time to prepare their response to and reply in support of the Motion and 19 Petition. 20 9. 21 This extension will not impact any other hearings or deadlines in this matter. The hearing on the Motion and Petition is set for June 9, 2023. 22 23 Date: April 6, 2023 STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/Robin B. Ratner Robin B. Ratner, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Raw Farm, LLC fka Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark McAfee; and Non-Party Aaron McAfee -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY 1 2 Date: April 6, 2023 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/Roger J. Gural Roger J. Gural, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff United States Of America 7 8 9 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER The stipulation of the parties is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: April 7, 2023 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?