United States of America v. Organic Pastures Dairy Company LLC et al
Filing
56
ORDER to Extend Deadlines to File Opposition to and Reply in Support of Motion to Reopen Case and Petition for an Order to Show Cause Why Raw Farm LLC F/K/A Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC, Mark Mcafee and Aaron Mcafee Should Not be Held in Civil Contempt, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/7/2023. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Robin B. Ratner, Esq. (SBN 195788)
rratner@structurelaw.com
STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP
1801 Century Park E., Suite 475
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 818-7500
Facsimile: (408) 441-7501
Attorneys for Defendants Raw Farm, LLC fka
Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark
McAfee; and Non-Party Aaron McAfee
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
ORGANIC PASTURES DAIRY
COMPANY, LLC, a corporation, and
MARK McAFEE, an individual,
17
Defendants.
18
19
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01786-JLT-SAB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
TO FILE OPPOSITION TO AND
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO REOPEN CASE AND
PETITION FOR AN ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY RAW FARM,
LLC F/K/A ORGANIC PASTURES
DAIRY COMPANY, LLC; MARK
MCAFEE; AND AARON MCAFEE
SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CIVIL
CONTEMPT
HEARING DATE: June 9, 2023
TIME: 9:30 AM
PLACE: Courtroom 4, Fresno
JUDGE: Hon. Jennifer L. Thurston
20
21
22
STIPULATION
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 143(a)(1), it is hereby stipulated by and between
24
Defendants Raw Farm, LLC fka Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark
25
McAfee; and Non-Party Aaron McAfee (collectively, “Raw Farm”) and Plaintiff
26
United States Of America’s (“Plaintiff”) as follows:
27
28
1.
On March 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Motion To Reopen Case (the
“Motion”) And Petition For An Order To Show Cause Why Raw Farm, LLC f/k/a
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
1
Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC; Mark McAfee; And Aaron McAfee Should
2
Not Be Held In Civil Contempt (the “Petition”).
3
4
5
2.
Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition is
currently April 10, 2023.
3.
Due to Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion and
6
Petition falling over the Passover and Easter holiday period, the Parties jointly agree
7
and hereby stipulate to a one-week extension for Raw Farm to file their response to
8
Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition, pursuant to Court approval.
9
10
11
12
13
14
4.
With a one-week extension, Raw Farm’s deadline to respond to
Plaintiff’s Motion and Petition would be April 17, 2023.
5.
The Parties further jointly agree and hereby stipulate a one-week
extension for Plaintiff to file its Reply Brief corresponding to the same.
6.
With a one-week extension, Plaintiff’s deadline to file a Reply brief in
support of its Motion and Petition would be April 27, 2023.
15
7.
There has been no previous extension of time requested or granted for
16
these deadlines.
17
8.
This extension is not to delay this matter, but to allow the Parties
18
adequate time to prepare their response to and reply in support of the Motion and
19
Petition.
20
9.
21
This extension will not impact any other hearings or deadlines in this
matter. The hearing on the Motion and Petition is set for June 9, 2023.
22
23
Date: April 6, 2023
STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/Robin B. Ratner
Robin B. Ratner, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants Raw Farm,
LLC fka Organic Pastures Dairy
Company, LLC; Mark McAfee; and
Non-Party Aaron McAfee
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
1
2
Date: April 6, 2023
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
3
By:
4
5
6
/s/Roger J. Gural
Roger J. Gural, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States Of America
7
8
9
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The stipulation of the parties is approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
April 7, 2023
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?