Carter v. Fernandez et al
Filing
101
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motions as MOOT re 92 & 93 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/15/2011. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
IVAN RAY CARTER, JR.,
9
10
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01841-AWI-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
AS MOOT
v.
(DOCS. 92, 93)
11
A. FERNANDEZ, et al.,
12
Defendants.
/
13
14
Plaintiff Ivan Ray Carter, Jr., (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
15
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
16
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding
17
on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants A. Fernandez, R. Reynaga, H. Carillo, L. Ceaser, and
18
D. Jones for violation of the Eighth Amendment. Pending before the Court are: 1) Plaintiff’s
19
motion for the undersigned to preside over this action during trial, filed June 30, 2011, and 2)
20
Plaintiff’s motion for a final decision on the undersigned’s May 25, 2011 Findings and
21
Recommendations, also filed June 30, 2011. Docs. 92, 93. Both motions are moot. Plaintiff
22
submitted his consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction on October 24, 2011. Doc. 98. The
23
district judge assigned to this action issued an order adopting the Findings and Recommendations
24
on September 21, 2011. Doc. 95. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions, filed June 30, 2011, are
25
denied as moot.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
November 15, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?