Foster v. Enenmoh et al

Filing 73

ORDER Finding No Entitlement To Expenses And Discharging Order (Docs. 55 and 65 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/13/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL LOUIS FOSTER, 10 CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01849-LJO-SKO PC Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ORDER FINDING NO ENTITLEMENT TO EXPENSES AND DISCHARGING ORDER A. ENENMOH, (Docs. 55 and 65) 13 Defendant. / 14 15 Plaintiff Michael Louis Foster, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 16 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 3, 2008. On April 16, 2012, the 17 Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel and gave Plaintiff thirty days within which to set forth, 18 under penalty of perjury, the reasonable expenses he incurred in making his motion. Fed. R. Civ. 19 P. 37(a)(5)(A). Plaintiff was informed that if, due to indigency or other reason, he did not incur any 20 expenses, he should state that fact. 21 On April 20, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of reasonable expenses that did not comply with 22 the terms of the Court’s order. Specifically, Plaintiff sought attorney’s fees in the amount of 23 $265.50, to which he was not entitled as a pro se litigant. 24 On April 24, 2012, the Court provided Plaintiff with one final opportunity to set forth any 25 reasonable expenses he actually incurred and notified Plaintiff that if he did not incur any expenses, 26 he is not entitled to reimbursement. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(A). The thirty-day deadline to comply 27 with the order has expired without a response from Plaintiff. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, no entitlement to expenses has been shown and the Court’s order providing 2 Plaintiff with the opportunity to set forth reasonable expenses incurred is HEREBY DISCHARGED. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: ie14hj July 13, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?