Rosedale Plaza Group, LLC v. BP West Coast Products, LLC

Filing 92

Stipulation and ORDER Re: Continuance of OSC Re: Dismissal of Action signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/21/2010. ( Filing Deadline: 2/19/2010)(Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
Martin R. Fox, Esq., SBN 155783 mfox@bleaufox.com 2 BLEAU FOX, A P. L.C. 3575 Cahuenga Boulevard West, Suite 580 3 Los Angeles, CA 90068 Telephone: (323) 874-8613 4 Facsimile: (323) 874-1234 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, 6 a California limited liability company 5 Jeffrey M. Hamerling, Esq., SBN 91532 jhamerling@archernorris.com 8 ARCHER NORRIS 2033 North Main Street, Suite 800 9 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 930-6600 10 Facsimile: (925) 930-6620 7 Attorneys for Defendant, BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC, 12 a Delaware limited liability company 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, a ) California limited liability company ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) CASE NUMBER: 1-08-CV-01874OWW-GSA Assigned to: Judge Oliver W. Wanger STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION Trial Date: Settled/Off-Calendar Place: Courtroom 3 Time: 9:00 a.m. It is hereby stipulated by and between ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as "ROSEDALE"), on the one hand, and BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as "BPWCP"), on the other hand, through 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 their respective attorneys of record: RECITALS and STIPULATIONS A. Through the efforts of the Court and the parties, the above-entitled matter has resolved; B. On November 16, 2009, the Court entered an order that the parties shall file a request for dismissal no later than December 7, 2009 or show cause why the Court should not dismiss the matter (Document No. 87). Later, the Court granted both parties' request for a continuance of the OSC RE: Dismissal (Document No. 90) to a new OSC Re: Dismissal date of January 21, 2010 C. Upon resolution of the matter, both parties have continuously worked to effectuate the resolution. D. However, the resolution entails several financial transactions and obligations, all of which must be set forth in detailed writing. Additionally, the transactions and obligations will take several months to conclude (at a minimum). The parties have exchanged several drafts of an Agreement detailing the resolution and have worked through almost all of the areas where they differed with only one or two remaining. The parties continue to work on those remaining areas and expect resolution on those matters shortly. E. In order to fully and completely ensure that this Court will not have to interact with these parties on this matter again, the writings are complex and involve multiple obligations and conditions precedent. F. Out of an abundance of caution, all Counsel agree, stipulate and respectfully request that, with the Court's permission, the Court continue the January 19, 2010 OSC Re: Dismissal to February 19, 2010 so that the parties can conclude their resolution. All counsel fully expect that this will be the last request for an extension of the OSC Re: Dismissal date. /// /// 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2010 emm0d6 Respectfully submitted, DATED: January 19, 2010 BLEAU FOX, A P.L.C. B Y: /s/ Martin Fox Martin R. Fox, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff, ROSEDALE PLAZA GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company DATED: January 19, 2010 ARCHER NORRIS BY: /s/ Jeffrey M. Hamerling Jeffrey M. Hamerling, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: a. The parties shall file a request for dismissal no later than February 19, 2010 or show cause why the Court should not dismiss the matter. /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?