Trice v. Modesto City Police Department et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/10/2009 granting 4 MOTION for EXTENSION of time to amend complaint filed by Kevin Laquan Trice. (Amended Complaint due by 3/16/2009).(Lundstrom, T)

1 2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action for damages 17 and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The 18 matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. Pending before 20 the Court is Plaintiff's application for an extension of time 21 within which to file a first amended complaint, filed on February 22 6, 2009. 23 Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's request 24 for an extension of time IS GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL FILE an 25 amended complaint no later than thirty days after the date of 26 service of this order. 27 Plaintiff IS INFORMED that the failure to file an amended 28 1 MODESTO CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. KEVIN LAQUAN TRICE, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-cv-01891-AWI-SMS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. 4) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS AFTER TH DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

complaint in accordance with this order will be considered to be a failure to comply with an order of the Court pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 and will result in dismissal of this action. Further, failure to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief may be granted will be considered to be grounds for dismissing the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and will result in dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 February 10, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2