Calloway v. Veal et al
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 78 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/19/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,
NO. 1:08 cv 01896 LJOP GSA PC
11
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DR. WANG, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 78 )
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
19
302.
20
On February 15, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
21
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied in part and granted in part. Plaintiff
22
requested and was granted an extension of time in which to file objections. On April 18, 2013,
23
Plaintiff filed a request to withdraw his motion for extension of time. No objections to the
24
findings and recommendations have been filed.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
28
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 15,
3
2013, are adopted in full;
4
5
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted on Plaintiff’s claim of deliberate
indifference to his serious medical needs;
6
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Dr. Wang and against Plaintiff;
7
4. This action proceeds against Defendants Oaks and Hayward on Plaintiff’s claim of
8
excessive force.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
April 19, 2013
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
B9ed48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?