Calloway v. Veal et al

Filing 87

ORDER Denying as moot 86 Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/2/13. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

12

1:08-cv-01896-LJO-GSA (PC)

Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT

13

vs.

14

DR. WANG, et al.,
(MOTION #86)

15

Defendants.

16

________________________________/

17

On May 1, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel and an

18

expert witness, to litigate this action. This case was closed on April 22, 2013. Defendants’

19

motions for summary judgment were granted, and judgment was entered in this case on April

20

22, 2013. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is moot.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion, filed on May 1, 2013,
is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
220hhe

May 2, 2013

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE