Ramon Reymundo v. James Hartley

Filing 32

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/19/11. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8 RAMON REYMUNDO,

CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01900-OWW-DLB PC

9

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS

10

Plaintiff,
v.

11 JAMES HARTLEY, et al.,

(DOC. 28)

12

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendants.
/

13
14
15

Plaintiff Ramon Reymundo (“Plaintiff”) was a prisoner in the custody of the California

16 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding
18 on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Bouhaben. On December 9, 2010, Defendant filed a
19 motion to dismiss for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Doc. 28. As of the
20 date of this order, Plaintiff has not file an opposition. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED
21 that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion within thirty (30) days from the date
22 of service of this order. Failure to file a timely opposition will result in waiver of any opposition
23 and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order.
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 19, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1