Ramon Reymundo v. James Hartley

Filing 32

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/19/11. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAMON REYMUNDO, CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01900-OWW-DLB PC 9 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 10 Plaintiff, v. 11 JAMES HARTLEY, et al., (DOC. 28) 12 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS Defendants. / 13 14 15 Plaintiff Ramon Reymundo (“Plaintiff”) was a prisoner in the custody of the California 16 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding 18 on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Bouhaben. On December 9, 2010, Defendant filed a 19 motion to dismiss for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Doc. 28. As of the 20 date of this order, Plaintiff has not file an opposition. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED 21 that Plaintiff is to file an opposition to Defendant’s motion within thirty (30) days from the date 22 of service of this order. Failure to file a timely opposition will result in waiver of any opposition 23 and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?