Carr v. Cate et al
Filing
101
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING Action, with Prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/4/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ORRIN CARR,
9
10
Plaintiff,
v.
11
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’
STIPULATION
[ECF No. 100]
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Orrin Carr is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 3, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal, with prejudice,
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed, with prejudice, and each party shall
20
bear their own costs in connection with this action. This Court shall retain jurisdiction for the sole
21
purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement agreed to by the parties.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
August 4, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?