Woodall v. State of California et al

Filing 54

ORDERED that Defendants are to file a Response to 52 MOTION to Extend the Time for Service Upon the Correct Defendant Valdez (Male Nurse) within fifteen days from the date of service of this order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/08/2010. (Response due by 10/26/2010)(Martin, S)

Download PDF
(PC) Woodall v. State of California et al Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NICK WOODALL, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01948-OWW-DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION (DOC. 52) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 15DAYS Defendants. / Plaintiff Nick Woodall ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Valdez, Raygosa, Sexton, Olive, Gonzalez, and Lawson. On September 30, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time for service of process on Defendant Valdez. Plaintiff contends that Defendant L. Valdez who appeared in this action is the incorrect Defendant. Plaintiff contends that the correct Defendant Valdez is male; the one who appeared is female. Plaintiff requests that Defendant L. Valdez be dismissed from this action and that he be provided an extension of time for service of process on the correct Defendant. Prior to adjudicating Plaintiff's motion, the Court will require Defendants to respond. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are to file a response to Plaintiff's motion within fifteen days from the date of service of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6 October 8, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?