Lopez v. Florez et al

Filing 107

ORDER Deeming Notice Of Failure To Respond To Interragatories As A Motion To Compel Discovery Responses Order Denying Motion To Compel (Docs. 102 and 105 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/7/2013. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDREW R. LOPEZ, 12 Case No. 1:08-cv-01975-LJO-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 ORDER DEEMING NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPOND TO INTERROGATORIES AS A MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL FLOREZ, et al, 15 Defendants. (Docs. 102 and 105). 16 17 On January 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Defendant’s Failure to Respond to 18 Interrogatories (Set Two).” (Doc. 102). Defendants objected to Plaintiff’s motion and attached a 19 copy of the responses served on Plaintiff. (Doc. 105). The Court will deem Plaintiff’s January 2, 20 2013 pleading as a Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. 21 Plaintiff states that he sent the discovery requests to Plaintiff on November 6, 2012, but 22 received no responses. (Doc. 102 at 1). Plaintiff claims that Defendants’ responses were due 23 December 21 2012 and asks this Court to enter “default” and sanctions against Defendants for 24 25 26 27 failing to respond. (Doc. 102). Defendants have attached copies of the responses to the interrogatories at issue. (Doc. 105-1). The documents demonstrate that Defendants’ served Plaintiff with their respective responses on December 21, 2012. Thus, Plaintiff’s need to compel the requested document is not necessary and sanctions are not warranted. 28 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s January 17, 2012 motion to 2 compel a Corrected Proof of Service and Plaintiff’s January 2, 2013 motion to compel 3 Defendants’ Responses to Interrogatories, Set Two, dated November 6, 2012 are DENIED as 4 moot. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 9j7khijed 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?