Lopez v. Florez et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In Full; DENYING 17 Motion Requesting Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/30/2010. (Martin, S)

(PC) Lopez v. Florez et al

Doc. 24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Andrew R. Lopez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 28, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which recommended that Plaintiff's March 24, 2010 motion requesting preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. #21.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Plaintiff filed objections on July 12, 2010. (Doc. #22.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ANDREW R. LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v.

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01975-LJO-SKO PC O R D E R ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21) FINDINGS AND

FLOREZ, et al., Defendants. /

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: b9ed48

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. 2. The June 28, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's March 24, 2010 motion requesting preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. August 30, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2