Palacios v. Nunez, et al.

Filing 43

ORDER vacating hearing date of January 4, 2010 and taking matter under submission. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/22/2009. (Nazaroff, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GLORIA PALACIOS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant Nunez has noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss, and Defendant Hancock has noticed for hearing and decision a motion to quash. The Defendants have joined in each other's motions. The matters were scheduled for hearing to be held on January 4, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition to each motion no later than December 21, 2009. Plaintiff failed to do so. Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely oppositions or notice of non-oppositions, she is in violation of the Local Rules. See 78-230(c). Plaintiff is further not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motions. See 78-230(c). The court has reviewed Defendants' motions and the applicable law, and has determined that the motions are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h). ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HENRY D. NUNEZ, et al., WILLIAM ) F. HANCOCK, JR., et al., and DOES ) 1 through 100, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:08-CV-01996-AWI-GSA ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE OF JANUARY 4, 2010 AND TAKING MATTERS UNDER SUBMISSION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of January 4, 2010, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of January 4, 2010, the court will take the matters under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 22, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?