Muldrew, et al. v. County of Fresno, et al.

Filing 88

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 29, 2012. (Munoz, I)

1
2
3
4

Michael G. Woods, # 058683-0
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
P.O. Box 28912
5 River Park Place East
Fresno, CA 93720-1501
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF FRESNO

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

IVANA MULDREW, DARREN HISE,

12

Plaintiffs,

13

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS
IN LIMINE

v.

14

Case No. 1:09-CV- 00023-LJO-DLB

COUNTY OF FRESNO, KENNETH
TANIGUICHI,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18

Plaintiff IVANA MULDREW and Defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO, through

19

their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant’s Motions in Limine Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

20

7, 8, 11, 13, 16, 17 and 18 may be granted by the Court.

21

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE

1

Dated: February 29, 2012

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

2
3
By:
4
5
6

/s/ Michael G. Woods
Michael G. Woods
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF FRESNO

Dated: February 29, 2012
LAW OFFICE OF GORDON DEAN BROWN

7
8

By:

9
10

/s/ Gordon Dean Brown
Gordon Dean Brown
Attorney for Plaintiff, IVANA
MULDREW

11
ORDER
12
Upon reviewing the Stipulation entered into by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, and
13

good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motions in Limine Nos.

14
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 16, 17 and 18 are granted.
15
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 29, 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
DEAC_Signature-END:

20

66h44d

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP

2
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS IN LIMINE