Fordjour v. Jordan, et al.

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING Petitioners motions for immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief re: 6 & 7 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/20/2010. (Marrujo, C)

(HC) Fordjour v. Jordan, et al.

Doc. 27

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CHARLES FORDJOUR, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 14 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus ostensibly pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been v. KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF CHRIS JORDAN, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv--00060-OWW-SKO-HC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITIONER'S MOTIONS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, IMMEDIATE RELEASE, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (DOCS. 23, 6, 7)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. On June 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations that the Court deny Petitioner's motions for immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief. findings and recommendations were served on all parties. On These

August 10, 2010, Petitioner mailed untimely objections (Doc. 25, 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4) that were filed in this Court on August 16, 2010.

The Court

has nevertheless considered the objections filed by Petitioner. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and has considered the objections; the undersigned has determined there is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on the points raised in the objections. The Court finds that the

report and recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on June 29, 2010, are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Petitioner's motions for immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief are DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2