Barry Lamon v. Tilton et al
Filing
104
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Send Plaintiff Courtesy Copies of Order and Judgment, and Change Plaintiff's Address of Record to CSP-Sacramento 103 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/22/13. ( Plaintiff's address changed as to this order)(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
BARRY LAMON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00157-AWI-SKO PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SEND PLAINTIFF COURTESY COPIES OF
ORDER AND JUDGMENT, AND CHANGE
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS OF RECORD TO CSPSACRAMENTO
v.
JOHN TILTON, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
(Doc. 103)
/
15
Plaintiff Barry Lamon, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
16
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 26, 2009. On July 31, 2013, the Court
17
granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and entered judgment. On August 21, 2013,
18
Plaintiff filed a declaration attesting that he was not served with the order and judgment and
19
requesting service.
20
On July 31, 2013, Plaintiff was served by mail with the order and judgment at his address of
21
record with the Court and therefore, service is deemed effective. Local Rule 182(f). Based on the
22
return address listed in the corner of the declaration, Plaintiff is now at California State Prison23
Represa rather than of Salinas Valley State Prison. However, Plaintiff has not filed a notice of
24
change of address in this case.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
Based on the foregoing, as a courtesy to Plaintiff, the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff
2
copies of the order and judgment and shall change Plaintiff’s address of record to CSP-Sacramento.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
i0d3h8
August 22, 2013
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?