Cantu v. Garcia et al

Filing 129

ORDER REQUIRING Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline 128 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/27/15: 10-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA J. CANTU, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. GARCIA, et al., 15 Case No. 1:09-cv-00177 AWI DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (Document 128) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Joshua J. Cantu (“Plaintiff”) is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 14, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel and ordered 20 Defendant Baptiste to provide responses to Plaintiff’s April 23, 2014, discovery requests within 21 forty-five days. 22 23 24 The discovery deadline has passed. Currently, dispositive motions are to be filed by February 27, 2015. On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request to extend the dispositive motion deadline. He 25 was recently released from custody and indicates that he has not received the responses from 26 Defendant Baptiste. 27 28 1 1 Given the procedural posture of this action and the length of time it has been pending, the 2 Court orders Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s motion within ten (10) days. A reply is not 3 necessary. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis February 27, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?