Cantu v. Garcia et al

Filing 134

ORDER Granting Defendants' Request For Late Filing (Document 131 ), ORDER Discharging Order To Show Cause (Document 130 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/20/2015. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA J. CANTU, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. GARCIA, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:09-cv-00177 AWI DLB PC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR LATE FILING (Document 131) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Document 130) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff Joshua J. Cantu (“Plaintiff”) is a former California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 27, 2015, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s February 25, 2015, motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline. After not receiving a response within the allotted time, the Court issued an order to show cause on March 17, 2015. Defendants were ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the February 27, 2015, Court order. Shortly after the order issued, Defendants filed their response, along with a request for a late filing. In the request, Defendants’ counsel states that she was out of the office for trial preparation 26 and trial from March 2, 2015, through March 16, 2015. ECF No. 131, at 1. She therefore missed the 27 March 12, 2015, deadline to respond to the order to show cause. 28 1 1 Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request to permit a late filing and 2 DISCHARGES the order to show cause. The Court will address Plaintiff’s motion to extend the 3 dispositive motion deadline by separate order. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis March 20, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?