Lamon v. Adams et al

Filing 264

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Reconsider Its Order Striking Plaintiff's Opposition Brief And Striking Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 263 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/21/2014. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

BARRY LOUIS LAMON
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

Case No. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SMS PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
TO RECONSIDER ITS ORDER STRIKING
PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION BRIEF AND
STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS

DERRAL ADAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

14

(Doc. 263)

15
On April 24, 2014, this Court denied Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time for lack of

16
17

good cause. Doc. 258. On May 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed an untimely motion for reconsideration.

18

Plaintiff having failed to establish good cause for reconsideration of the Court's April 24, 2014 order

19

denying enlargement of time, the Court denied the motion.

20
Despite the Court's denial of Plaintiff's motion to enlarge time, on May 5, 2005, Plaintiff
21

22

filed an untimely reply brief. The Court struck the brief as untimely.

23

Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of the Court's order striking his reply brief. Since

24

the Court has repeatedly denied Plaintiff's prior motions regarding the untimely submission of his

25

reply brief, this motion is duplicative, frivolous, and abusive of the Court and the Defendants. As

26
27

this Court has repeatedly stated, Plaintiff's disagreement with the Court's rulings is not grounds for
///

28
1

1
2
3

reconsideration. See Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co., 571 F.3d 873, 880
(9th Cir. 2009); Harvest v. Castro, 531 F.3d 737, 748-49 (9th Cir. 2008).
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES, with prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion for the Magistrate

4

Judge to Reconsider Her Order Striking My Opposition (Doc. 263) and STRIKES Plaintiff's

5

Objections to the Court Order (Doc. 263). No further motions for reconsideration will be

6

considered, and if one is filed, it will be summarily stricken from the record without further notice.

7
8
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 21, 2014

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2