Lamon v. Adams et al
Filing
299
ORDER Adopting 291 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to DENY Plaintiff's 287 Motion for Access to Case Files and Legal Materials for Lack of Jurisdiction signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/2/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
Case No. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-JLT (PC)
10
BARRY LOUIS LAMON,
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ACCESS TO CASE FILES AND
LEGAL MATERIALS FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION
Defendants.
(Docs. 287, 291)
12
v.
13
ADAMS, et al.,
14
15
16
Plaintiff, Barry Louis Lamon, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
17
in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On October 6, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which
20
was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings
21
and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither side filed any objections.
22
Local Rule 304(b), (d).
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a
24
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
25
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
26
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 291), is adopted
in full; and
1
1
2.
2
Plaintiff’s motion, filed on September 21, 2015 (Doc. 287) requesting access to
case files and legal materials, is denied for lack of jurisdiction.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
December 2, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?