Lamon v. Adams et al

Filing 337

ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's 336 Motion to Withdraw Stipulation for Dismissal as MOOT signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/23/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY LAMON, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ADAMS, et al., 15 Case No. 1:09-cv-00205-JLT PC ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AS MOOT (Doc. 336) Defendants 16 17 On March 17, 2016, the parties filed a fully executed stipulation for voluntary dismissal of 18 this action with prejudice. (Doc. 330.) The Court issued an order dismissing the action pursuant 19 to that stipulation the next day. (Doc. 331.) Approximately a week later, Plaintiff filed a notice of 20 withdrawal of his consent to the terms of the settlement in which he moved to stay entry of final 21 judgment in this action until the terms of the settlement are met which was denied for lack of 22 jurisdiction on April 7, 2016. (Docs. 332, 336.) 23 On April 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a second motion for withdrawal of the stipulation for 24 dismissal which raised the same arguments as his first motion. (Doc. 336.) The Court notes that 25 Plaintiff signed his second motion on April 2, 2016 and gave to prison staff for mailing on April 4, 26 2016. (Doc. 336.) Plaintiff had not received the ruling on his first motion seeking relief from the 27 settlement when he mailed the second. It is apparent that the order on Plaintiff’s first motion and 28 his second motion crossed in the mail. 1 Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. Plaintiff=s motion for withdrawal of stipulation for dismissal, filed on April 11, 2016 (Doc. 336), is DISREGARDED as moot. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: May 23, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?