Lamon v. Adams et al
Filing
337
ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's 336 Motion to Withdraw Stipulation for Dismissal as MOOT signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/23/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BARRY LAMON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ADAMS, et al.,
15
Case No. 1:09-cv-00205-JLT PC
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO WITHDRAW STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL AS MOOT
(Doc. 336)
Defendants
16
17
On March 17, 2016, the parties filed a fully executed stipulation for voluntary dismissal of
18 this action with prejudice. (Doc. 330.) The Court issued an order dismissing the action pursuant
19 to that stipulation the next day. (Doc. 331.) Approximately a week later, Plaintiff filed a notice of
20 withdrawal of his consent to the terms of the settlement in which he moved to stay entry of final
21 judgment in this action until the terms of the settlement are met which was denied for lack of
22 jurisdiction on April 7, 2016. (Docs. 332, 336.)
23
On April 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a second motion for withdrawal of the stipulation for
24 dismissal which raised the same arguments as his first motion. (Doc. 336.) The Court notes that
25 Plaintiff signed his second motion on April 2, 2016 and gave to prison staff for mailing on April 4,
26 2016. (Doc. 336.) Plaintiff had not received the ruling on his first motion seeking relief from the
27 settlement when he mailed the second. It is apparent that the order on Plaintiff’s first motion and
28 his second motion crossed in the mail.
1
Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS:
2
1. Plaintiff=s motion for withdrawal of stipulation for dismissal, filed on April 11, 2016
(Doc. 336), is DISREGARDED as moot.
3
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
May 23, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?