Golden v. County of Tulare, et al.

Filing 78

STIPULATION of Settlement and Request For Dismissal; ORDER in re to Minute Orders ECF Docket Nos 72 & 76 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/10/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 7 Andrew V. Stearns, SBN 164849 Steven M. Berki, SBN 245426 Gaurav D. Sharma, SBN 269123 BUSTAMANTE ♦ O'HARA ♦ GAGLIASSO, PC River Park Tower 333 W. San Carlos St., 8th Floor San Jose, California 95110 Telephone: (408) 977-1911 Facsimile: (408) 977-0746 astearns@boglawyers.com sberki@boglawyers.com gsharma@boglawyers.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL GOLDEN 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FRESNO DIVISION 13 *** 14 MICHAEL GOLDEN, Plaintiffs, 15 16 vs. 17 COUNTY OF TULARE; an entity of unknown form; TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF BILL WITTMAN, in his individual and official capacity; and DOES 1 through 50, 18 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:09-cv-00263-0WW DLB STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE ORDERS ECF DOCKET NOS. [72], [76] Complaint Filed: February 11, 2009 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES through their counsel of record as follows: 24 WHEREAS, this matter was settled in April 2011. 25 WHEREAS, each of the parties has fully performed under the terms of the settlement. 26 WHEREAS, the parties request the entire case referenced above be dismissed with 27 prejudice. 28 Page 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76] 1 THEREFORE, the parties have stipulated and agreed to the following and seek the Court’s 2 approval of the same: 3 1. The entire case referenced above having been settled unconditionally, the abovereferenced matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 4 5 6 BUSTAMANTE, O’HARA & GAGLIASSO, PC DATED: August 10, 2011 7 8 By: 9 10 /S ANDREW V. STEARNS STEVEN M. BERKI GAURAV D. SHARMA Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL GOLDEN 11 12 13 DATED: August 10, 2011 TULARE COUNTY COUNSEL 14 By: 15 16 17 /S KATHLEEN TAYLOR JUDY CHAPMAN Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE and TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF BILL WITTMAN 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 // 28 // Page 2 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76] FINAL PROCEDURES 15.1 AND 15.2 STATEMENT 1 I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each 2 3 signatory above pursuant to Local Final Procedures 15.1 and 15.2. 4 5 BUSTAMANTE ♦ O'HARA ♦ GAGLIASSO, PC DATED: August 10, 2011 6 7 By: 8 9 /S ANDREW V. STEARNS Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 ORDER 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 Dated: August 10, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: emm0d64h 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?