Golden v. County of Tulare, et al.
Filing
78
STIPULATION of Settlement and Request For Dismissal; ORDER in re to Minute Orders ECF Docket Nos 72 & 76 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/10/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
7
Andrew V. Stearns, SBN 164849
Steven M. Berki, SBN 245426
Gaurav D. Sharma, SBN 269123
BUSTAMANTE ♦ O'HARA ♦ GAGLIASSO, PC
River Park Tower
333 W. San Carlos St., 8th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
Telephone: (408) 977-1911
Facsimile: (408) 977-0746
astearns@boglawyers.com
sberki@boglawyers.com
gsharma@boglawyers.com
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL GOLDEN
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
FRESNO DIVISION
13
***
14
MICHAEL GOLDEN,
Plaintiffs,
15
16
vs.
17
COUNTY OF TULARE; an entity of
unknown form;
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF BILL
WITTMAN, in his individual and official
capacity; and
DOES 1 through 50,
18
19
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:09-cv-00263-0WW DLB
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL;
ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE ORDERS
ECF DOCKET NOS. [72], [76]
Complaint Filed: February 11, 2009
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES
through their counsel of record as follows:
24
WHEREAS, this matter was settled in April 2011.
25
WHEREAS, each of the parties has fully performed under the terms of the settlement.
26
WHEREAS, the parties request the entire case referenced above be dismissed with
27
prejudice.
28
Page 1
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE
ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76]
1
THEREFORE, the parties have stipulated and agreed to the following and seek the Court’s
2
approval of the same:
3
1. The entire case referenced above having been settled unconditionally, the abovereferenced matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
4
5
6
BUSTAMANTE, O’HARA & GAGLIASSO, PC
DATED: August 10, 2011
7
8
By:
9
10
/S
ANDREW V. STEARNS
STEVEN M. BERKI
GAURAV D. SHARMA
Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL GOLDEN
11
12
13
DATED: August 10, 2011
TULARE COUNTY COUNSEL
14
By:
15
16
17
/S
KATHLEEN TAYLOR
JUDY CHAPMAN
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE and
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF BILL WITTMAN
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
//
28
//
Page 2
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE
ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76]
FINAL PROCEDURES 15.1 AND 15.2 STATEMENT
1
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each
2
3
signatory above pursuant to Local Final Procedures 15.1 and 15.2.
4
5
BUSTAMANTE ♦ O'HARA ♦ GAGLIASSO, PC
DATED: August 10, 2011
6
7
By:
8
9
/S
ANDREW V. STEARNS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
ORDER
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated:
August 10, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
emm0d64h
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER IN RE TO MINUTE
ORDERS [ECF DOCKET NOS. 72, 76]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?