Hernandez v. Jordan et al

Filing 21

ORDER Vacating Hearing Date Pursuant to Local Rule 230(L); ORDER Requiring Defendant to File Proof of Service within Ten Days, and Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within Thirty Days of Service, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/17/2010. (Verduzco, M)

(PC) Hernandez v. Jordan et al

Doc. 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ANGEL H. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v.

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00268-LJO-SMS PC ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 230(L) (Doc. 19)

CHRIS JORDAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE PROOF SERVICE WITHIN TEN DAYS, AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF SERVICE (Doc. 19)

Plaintiff Angel H. Hernandez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 11, 2009. On December 16, 2010, Defendant Costner filed a motion to dismiss, noticed for January 18, 2011, before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), the motion shall be resolved without a hearing. Further, the motion lacks a proof of service, a deficiency which Defendant shall cure within ten days. 1. 2. 3. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), the hearing set for January 18, 2011, is vacated; Defendant shall file a proof of service within ten (10) days; Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the motion, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition; and

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4.

The failure to oppose the motion may result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 December 17, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2