Norwood v. Cate et al

Filing 56

ORDER Denying 44 Motion Requesting to Make Copies Exceeding the Prison Policy of 100 Copies, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/19/11. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD, 10 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00330-OWW-GBC (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION REQUESTING TO MAKE COPIES EXCEEDING THE PRISON POLICY OF 100 COPIES (Doc. 44) v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 Plaintiff Gregory Lynn Norwood ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 16 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on 17 Plaintiff's first amended complaint, filed on August 14, 2009, against Defendants Kenneth Clark 18 Allison, T. P. Wan, J. Reynoso and W. J. Sullivan. (Docs. 11, 15, 17, 19, 20). On June 16, 2011, 19 Plaintiff filed a motion to order the prison to allow Plaintiff to make copies in excess of the 100 copy 20 limit pursuant to a prison policy. (Doc. 44). 21 The Court recognizes that prison administrators "should be accorded wide-ranging deference 22 in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve 23 internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security." Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 24 321-322 (1986) (quoting Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 547 (1970). Moreover, the Court lacks 25 jurisdiction to issue an order requiring the designated prison officials to make extra copies for 26 Plaintiff. See Zepeda v. United States Immigration Service, 753 F.2d 719, 727 (9th Cir. 1985). 27 Therefore, the Court defers to the prison's policies and practices in limiting prisoners to 100 copies. 28 1 1 2 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion requesting to exceed the 100 page copy limit, is HEREBY DENIED. (Doc. 44). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 0jh02o August 19, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?