Azevedo v. City of Fresno et al
Filing
82
Joint STIPULATION to Continue Pretrial Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/2/2012. ( Pretrial Conference previously set for 2/2/2012 has been CONTINUED to 2/10/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii)(Figueroa, O)
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
Dale K. Galipo (Bar No. 144074)
dalekgalipo@yahoo.com
2
21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310
3 Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: (818) 347-3333
4 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118
5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 LAWRENCE AZEVEDO,
10
Plaintiff
11
Case No. 1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB
JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
vs.
12 CITY OF FRESNO; et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff’s trial counsel, Dale Galipo is scheduled to be engaged in a federal
16 civil rights trial in the case of Contreras v. City of Los Angeles in the U.S. Court for
17 the Central District of California on February 2, 2012. Mr. Galipo will, therefore,
18 be unavailable to attend the pretrial conference on February 2, 2012 at 8:30 am as
19 currently scheduled.
20
Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and requested by the parties that the Pretrial
21 Conference previously set for February 2, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. be continued to
22 February 10, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
23
24 DATED: February 1, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
25
26
27
By
/s/ Dale K. Galipo
Dale K. Galipo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
28
1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
1 DATED: February 1, 2012
2
WEAKLEY & ARENDT LLP
3
By:
4
5
/s/ James J. Arendt
James Arendt
Attorneys for Defendants
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated: February 2, 2012
8
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9 0m8i788
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB
-2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?