Azevedo v. City of Fresno et al

Filing 82

Joint STIPULATION to Continue Pretrial Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/2/2012. ( Pretrial Conference previously set for 2/2/2012 has been CONTINUED to 2/10/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii)(Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo (Bar No. 144074) dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 2 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 3 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 4 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LAWRENCE AZEVEDO, 10 Plaintiff 11 Case No. 1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE vs. 12 CITY OF FRESNO; et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff’s trial counsel, Dale Galipo is scheduled to be engaged in a federal 16 civil rights trial in the case of Contreras v. City of Los Angeles in the U.S. Court for 17 the Central District of California on February 2, 2012. Mr. Galipo will, therefore, 18 be unavailable to attend the pretrial conference on February 2, 2012 at 8:30 am as 19 currently scheduled. 20 Therefore, it is hereby stipulated and requested by the parties that the Pretrial 21 Conference previously set for February 2, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. be continued to 22 February 10, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. 23 24 DATED: February 1, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 25 26 27 By /s/ Dale K. Galipo Dale K. Galipo Attorneys for Plaintiff 28 1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 1 DATED: February 1, 2012 2 WEAKLEY & ARENDT LLP 3 By: 4 5 /s/ James J. Arendt James Arendt Attorneys for Defendants 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: February 2, 2012 8 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 9 0m8i788 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1:09-CV-00375 AWI DLB -2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?